But he hasn't denied saying it so now sure thats game over

what he's said we he was merely repeating he had been accused of saying in a sarcastic/incredulous manner. Its a ridiculous defence but at the same time quite clever because i'm not really sure how it could be proven one way or another.

Had he simply claimed he'd not said it then it truly WOULD be game over as the lip reading evidence would have proven him a liar.

Posted By: Jim on July 9th 2012 at 15:54:21

Message Thread

Game over for John Terry (General Chat) - norway, Jul 9, 15:36:48
- Durrrr (General Chat) - Old Git, Jul 9, 16:50:43
- But he hasn't denied saying it so now sure thats game over (General Chat) - Jim, Jul 9, 15:54:21
  - Not sure even! (n/m) (General Chat) - Jim, Jul 9, 15:54:46
- It could have been some one else, throwing their voice (n/m) (General Chat) - CB41, Jul 9, 15:40:56
  - throwing their lips* (n/m) (General Chat) - Dog, Jul 9, 15:53:24
- Maximum penalty of ?2,500 fine (General Chat) - Duck, Jul 9, 15:39:32
  - Would he ever play for England again if found guilty? (General Chat) - RootunTootunHootun, Jul 9, 15:52:31
  - the FA might be though (General Chat) - mr carra, Jul 9, 15:50:40
    - What ban did Suarez get for the Evra incident? (General Chat) - Duck, Jul 9, 15:56:28
      - 8 matches, was 9 because he flicked the bird at fulham fans (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, Jul 9, 15:59:19
        
        Oh well in that case, he probably will play for England again then! (n/m) (General Chat) - RootunTootunHootun, Jul 9, 16:02:02

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.