Is it better for a manager to be sacked, resign or go by 'mutual consent'?
In terms of getting future employment?
Wouldn't have thought that managers would want to have the 'honour' of being sacked on their C.V., can't look too good when applying for new jobs.
I'd guess the best is resigning due to not being able to get on with the board (i.e. Martin O'Neill), but surely the one that would suit us and Worthington at the moment would be mutual consent?
If that's the case, I reckon we'd get away with a deal like you said - not having to pay him off in full, although it'd still be costly.
Posted By: Declan on October 24th 2005 at 10:00:04
Message Thread
- How much will it cost to pay worthy off?.. (NCFC) - loz, Oct 24, 09:14:57
- The club has paid off the contacts of failing footballers in the past... (NCFC) - Ben, Oct 24, 09:20:49
- Is it better for a manager to be sacked, resign or go by 'mutual consent'? (NCFC) - Declan, Oct 24, 10:00:04
- Assuming a four year contract at ?250k+ year - (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Oct 24, 09:18:08
- depends who a new manager was? (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 24, 09:16:19
- The club has paid off the contacts of failing footballers in the past... (NCFC) - Ben, Oct 24, 09:20:49
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.