Surman is still better at it though, Pilks is a long term option

We need to forget about being pretty for the rest of this season and just try to grind out some results, then when we have Ayala and Bennett as our central defense starting next season we can buy a decent CDM to protect them, therefore not having to rely on Surman and being able to play Pilks in a 442, that would also require us signing a new striker to partner Holt, mind you!

Posted By: Common Sense Police on March 31st 2012 at 17:13:37

Message Thread

Back to a flat back four from now on, would like to see... (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Mar 31, 16:58:41
- Would rather Pilks than Surman (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Mar 31, 17:03:26
  - Surman makes us less vulnerable defensively and allows the LB to overlap (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Mar 31, 17:06:16
    - Pilks has got better at defending (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Mar 31, 17:09:52
      - Surman is still better at it though, Pilks is a long term option (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Mar 31, 17:13:37
        
        We need goals at the moment and Pilks would score more than Surman (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Mar 31, 17:15:05
        
        We are scoring goals, but conceeding far more! (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Mar 31, 17:20:07
- Looks good to me. (n/m) (NCFC) - Rob NCFC, Mar 31, 16:59:11

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.