Surman makes us less vulnerable defensively and allows the LB to overlap

I do rate Pilks, but we need to stop conceeding so many goals, E.Bennett also offers the RB good protection, I feel that we'd be far more difficult to break down with this side.

Posted By: Common Sense Police on March 31st 2012 at 17:06:16

Message Thread

Back to a flat back four from now on, would like to see... (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Mar 31, 16:58:41
- Would rather Pilks than Surman (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Mar 31, 17:03:26
  - Surman makes us less vulnerable defensively and allows the LB to overlap (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Mar 31, 17:06:16
    - Pilks has got better at defending (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Mar 31, 17:09:52
      - Surman is still better at it though, Pilks is a long term option (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Mar 31, 17:13:37
        
        We need goals at the moment and Pilks would score more than Surman (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Mar 31, 17:15:05
        
        We are scoring goals, but conceeding far more! (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Mar 31, 17:20:07
- Looks good to me. (n/m) (NCFC) - Rob NCFC, Mar 31, 16:59:11

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.