nawty nawty
it's not the percentage correct that should be of interest but the percentage of mistakes that the focus should fall upon. if i could be arsed, i'd monitor the circumstances that led to the mistake, both in the awarding of the wrong decision and in the context of the lead up to it. it may be that the ref has been influenced by an earlier decision that he (knows that) he has f**ked up on and is trying to redress the balance. this can happen due to influence from shouty players, purple bonced managers and crowds full of f**ktards.
i'd then do a big swish report on glossy paper and charge the premier league a bazillion pounds for it.
Posted By: Tombs on February 28th 2012 at 12:31:10
Message Thread
- oliver the ref saturday (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 28, 12:00:43
- According to some people they are crap (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Feb 28, 12:08:30
- i wonder if the stats from independent monitoring would be similar? (NCFC) - Tombs, Feb 28, 12:18:45
- by independent monitoring you mean (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Feb 28, 12:26:46
- nawty nawty (NCFC) - Tombs, Feb 28, 12:31:10
- sorry (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Feb 28, 12:44:04
- bit of the old self-discipline sometimes gobb (NCFC) - Tombs, Feb 28, 12:54:43
- sorry (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Feb 28, 12:44:04
- nawty nawty (NCFC) - Tombs, Feb 28, 12:31:10
- by independent monitoring you mean (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Feb 28, 12:26:46
- i wonder if the stats from independent monitoring would be similar? (NCFC) - Tombs, Feb 28, 12:18:45
- According to some people they are crap (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Feb 28, 12:08:30
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.