good point but for ref missing 2 stonewall penaltys may have been more
but we have got to learn to stop pinging it long when under pressure and giving it straight back. interestingly when in the first half we were keeping down and playing we had more stats in are favour during that period of the game. That soon changed when we started lumping long
Posted By: eddie on December 20th 2011 at 21:41:55
Message Thread
- good point but for ref missing 2 stonewall penaltys may have been more (NCFC) - eddie, Dec 20, 21:41:55
- thank fuck the lino was sharp (NCFC) - Tombs, Dec 20, 21:43:46
- Bit open wunt ut (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 20, 21:50:08
- We didn't really appeal for the 2nd one did we? Nobody noticed it (n/m) (NCFC) - Only1Doherty, Dec 20, 21:42:49
- thank fuck the lino was sharp (NCFC) - Tombs, Dec 20, 21:43:46
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.