Holt vs Morrison

I've noticed that there has been some argument about the use of Morrison over holty in the current team.....
heres my thoughts...
although i really rate holt and i actually think that that holt could do a good job in this league. Morrison is i think a better choice in the current system.
Playing one man up front.. I would chose Morrison over holt. Holt is a better finisher and i think a better feeder player for a second striker like jackson or vaughan, but as a lone striker??? you need a lone striker to stand up the front like a lemon and be very strong and good in the air.. I also think Morrison is slightly quicker than Holt and Holt can be guilty of wandering around and playing slightly deep. also i think we cant play the diamond we used in the lower leagues, therefore its unlikely we'll use a front 2 and hoolahoop again. Its a shame about Vaughan because from the little bits i saw i would to have seen a holt vaughan partnership. I think the time will come though for the Holt - jackson to make a come back and I think we could use both tactics.

although lets be honest if holt didn't play all season and morrison and hoolahoop kept us up... id take that any day ... sorry holty

Posted By: hairyolaf on October 12th 2011 at 21:08:18

Message Thread

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.

Log in