totally agree

but Hucks made about 5/6 times the amount of runs at players than Bellars did, therefore, has a higher total success rate, if a worse percentage.

Posted By: Shane Warne on September 21st 2005 at 15:19:23

Message Thread

Agree or disagree? (NCFC) - Tomblander, Sep 21, 14:46:35
- Disagree (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Sep 21, 15:03:02
- Nigel Worthington won us the league (NCFC) - Butterworth, Sep 21, 14:55:15
- Without him we wouldn;t have won the league (NCFC) - Shane Warne, Sep 21, 14:54:22
  - Bellamy was better than Hucks and we never got anywhere near. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Sep 21, 15:00:50
    - Agree, but (NCFC) - Shane Warne, Sep 21, 15:05:33
      - Bellamy didn't run at defenders ? You're avin a giraffe int yuh ? (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 21, 15:07:55
        
        he ran at them to an extent, (NCFC) - Shane Warne, Sep 21, 15:14:18
        
        Not the same style as Hucks. No you're right - Bellars beat them more than 30% of the time (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 21, 15:17:31
        
        totally agree (NCFC) - Shane Warne, Sep 21, 15:19:23
        
        Yeah and while Hucks was tripping over the defenders again... (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 21, 15:21:06
        
        He was great for us... (NCFC) - Delveg, Sep 21, 15:28:51
        
        he may well have been (NCFC) - Shane Warne, Sep 21, 15:24:07
    - thats cos he was tantruming prick (NCFC) - pants, Sep 21, 15:03:38
      - Not really though - scored a hatful of goals for us. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Sep 21, 15:06:30
        
        haha (NCFC) - pants, Sep 21, 15:11:44
        
        True - wonderful for us though, lit up a very poor side. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Sep 21, 15:13:13
        
        I think bentley is a poor mans stuart barlow (NCFC) - pants, Sep 21, 15:16:28
        
        or Dierdre Barlow (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 21, 15:21:31
        
        Haha! (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Sep 21, 15:18:57
  - disagree with everything in that first paragraph (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Sep 21, 14:59:13
    - So you think we'd have won the league without Huckerby? (NCFC) - Shane Warne, Sep 21, 15:02:08
      - that isn't what you said though (NCFC) - mr carra, Sep 21, 15:05:54
        
        An interesting point about the defence, (NCFC) - Shane Warne, Sep 21, 15:11:45
        
        disagree with that last point (NCFC) - mr carra, Sep 21, 15:22:11
        
        Yep, I know it's not a great example (NCFC) - Shane Warne, Sep 21, 15:28:31
        
        Agree there (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Sep 21, 15:11:05
  - Agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - Tomblander, Sep 21, 14:55:40
- disagree, but (NCFC) - johnmcdowellshair, Sep 21, 14:52:07
- disgree (NCFC) - mr carra, Sep 21, 14:50:05
  - but without Huckerby, and after Forest away (NCFC) - pants, Sep 21, 14:52:33
    - that's a different argument though (NCFC) - mr carra, Sep 21, 14:56:34
    - It wasn't his debut (n/m) (NCFC) - Delveg, Sep 21, 14:55:03
      - Must have been the first time he was on the telly then ;-) (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 21, 15:03:10
        
        Lol, that's true aswell (n/m) (NCFC) - Delveg, Sep 21, 15:08:21
- My version from below..."You what ?" (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 21, 14:47:39
  - TY, I read it after posting. (NCFC) - Tomblander, Sep 21, 14:48:53
- disagree (NCFC) - pants, Sep 21, 14:47:21
  - Now that I agree with, but that's along with (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 21, 14:48:13
  - well that was the fucking question (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 21, 14:48:07
    - No it fucking wasn't (n/m) (NCFC) - Butterworth, Sep 21, 14:49:16
    - no it wasn't you stupid fucking cockwipe (NCFC) - pants, Sep 21, 14:48:42
    - Not it wasn't (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 21, 14:48:39
- agree (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 21, 14:47:13

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.