My version from below..."You what ?"
"Huckerby won us the league single handedly (albeit a lower league)."
For one - yes - Hucks was not playing in the Premiership or in the UEFA Cup for us.
Secondly - single-handedly ?!!! He went off the boil now and again himself. Have you forgotten the massive impacts of Crouch, Francis, McKenzie and Svensson - all coming in timed to perfection to spur us on that little bit further ? Not to mention all the 1 goal wins with Greeno playing out of his skin and Iwan's influence and occasional crucial goal.
Oh, and don't forget to credit Nielsen for f**king off earlier rather than later.
Posted By: Steve in Holland on September 21st 2005 at 14:47:39
Message Thread
- Agree or disagree? (NCFC) - Tomblander, Sep 21, 14:46:35
- Disagree (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Sep 21, 15:03:02
- Nigel Worthington won us the league (NCFC) - Butterworth, Sep 21, 14:55:15
- Without him we wouldn;t have won the league (NCFC) - Shane Warne, Sep 21, 14:54:22
- Bellamy was better than Hucks and we never got anywhere near. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Sep 21, 15:00:50
- Agree, but (NCFC) - Shane Warne, Sep 21, 15:05:33
- Bellamy didn't run at defenders ? You're avin a giraffe int yuh ? (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 21, 15:07:55
- he ran at them to an extent, (NCFC) - Shane Warne, Sep 21, 15:14:18
- Not the same style as Hucks. No you're right - Bellars beat them more than 30% of the time (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 21, 15:17:31
- totally agree (NCFC) - Shane Warne, Sep 21, 15:19:23
- Yeah and while Hucks was tripping over the defenders again... (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 21, 15:21:06
- He was great for us... (NCFC) - Delveg, Sep 21, 15:28:51
- he may well have been (NCFC) - Shane Warne, Sep 21, 15:24:07
- Yeah and while Hucks was tripping over the defenders again... (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 21, 15:21:06
- totally agree (NCFC) - Shane Warne, Sep 21, 15:19:23
- Not the same style as Hucks. No you're right - Bellars beat them more than 30% of the time (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 21, 15:17:31
- he ran at them to an extent, (NCFC) - Shane Warne, Sep 21, 15:14:18
- Bellamy didn't run at defenders ? You're avin a giraffe int yuh ? (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 21, 15:07:55
- thats cos he was tantruming prick (NCFC) - pants, Sep 21, 15:03:38
- Not really though - scored a hatful of goals for us. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Sep 21, 15:06:30
- haha (NCFC) - pants, Sep 21, 15:11:44
- True - wonderful for us though, lit up a very poor side. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Sep 21, 15:13:13
- I think bentley is a poor mans stuart barlow (NCFC) - pants, Sep 21, 15:16:28
- or Dierdre Barlow (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 21, 15:21:31
- Haha! (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Sep 21, 15:18:57
- I think bentley is a poor mans stuart barlow (NCFC) - pants, Sep 21, 15:16:28
- True - wonderful for us though, lit up a very poor side. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Sep 21, 15:13:13
- haha (NCFC) - pants, Sep 21, 15:11:44
- Not really though - scored a hatful of goals for us. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Sep 21, 15:06:30
- Agree, but (NCFC) - Shane Warne, Sep 21, 15:05:33
- disagree with everything in that first paragraph (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Sep 21, 14:59:13
- So you think we'd have won the league without Huckerby? (NCFC) - Shane Warne, Sep 21, 15:02:08
- that isn't what you said though (NCFC) - mr carra, Sep 21, 15:05:54
- An interesting point about the defence, (NCFC) - Shane Warne, Sep 21, 15:11:45
- disagree with that last point (NCFC) - mr carra, Sep 21, 15:22:11
- Yep, I know it's not a great example (NCFC) - Shane Warne, Sep 21, 15:28:31
- disagree with that last point (NCFC) - mr carra, Sep 21, 15:22:11
- Agree there (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Sep 21, 15:11:05
- An interesting point about the defence, (NCFC) - Shane Warne, Sep 21, 15:11:45
- that isn't what you said though (NCFC) - mr carra, Sep 21, 15:05:54
- So you think we'd have won the league without Huckerby? (NCFC) - Shane Warne, Sep 21, 15:02:08
- Agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - Tomblander, Sep 21, 14:55:40
- Bellamy was better than Hucks and we never got anywhere near. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Sep 21, 15:00:50
- disagree, but (NCFC) - johnmcdowellshair, Sep 21, 14:52:07
- disgree (NCFC) - mr carra, Sep 21, 14:50:05
- but without Huckerby, and after Forest away (NCFC) - pants, Sep 21, 14:52:33
- that's a different argument though (NCFC) - mr carra, Sep 21, 14:56:34
- It wasn't his debut (n/m) (NCFC) - Delveg, Sep 21, 14:55:03
- Must have been the first time he was on the telly then ;-) (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 21, 15:03:10
- Lol, that's true aswell (n/m) (NCFC) - Delveg, Sep 21, 15:08:21
- Must have been the first time he was on the telly then ;-) (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 21, 15:03:10
- but without Huckerby, and after Forest away (NCFC) - pants, Sep 21, 14:52:33
- My version from below..."You what ?" (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 21, 14:47:39
- TY, I read it after posting. (NCFC) - Tomblander, Sep 21, 14:48:53
- disagree (NCFC) - pants, Sep 21, 14:47:21
- Now that I agree with, but that's along with (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 21, 14:48:13
- well that was the fucking question (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 21, 14:48:07
- No it fucking wasn't (n/m) (NCFC) - Butterworth, Sep 21, 14:49:16
- no it wasn't you stupid fucking cockwipe (NCFC) - pants, Sep 21, 14:48:42
- Not it wasn't (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 21, 14:48:39
- agree (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 21, 14:47:13
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.