Could be many variations

Ohers may feel that Keelan and Forbes should get a look in and then you get down to questioning what the exact criteria are.

If you are literally judging the very best 11 players to play for Norwich, then Hux wouldn't be in the team. Ruel Fox was a better player and did the business.

Posted By: norway on March 9th 2011 at 13:54:32

Message Thread

I've picked the Greatest Ever Norwich City XI for this month's FourFourTwo mag... (NCFC) - canary_don, Mar 9, 13:30:49
- Tempted to say Lambert instead of Walker but fair enough as Walker did it at (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Mar 9, 13:59:36
- Good side, only (NCFC) - mr chimp, Mar 9, 13:55:12
  - ffs i need some sleep (NCFC) - mr chimp, Mar 9, 14:04:34
  - amazingly I saw his one cap for the England B (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Mar 9, 14:03:44
- Could be many variations (NCFC) - norway, Mar 9, 13:54:32
  - Ruel was fast and tricky, but never had Hucks end product! (n/m) (NCFC) - Claygate_Canary, Mar 9, 14:01:03
    - Disagree! (NCFC) - norway, Mar 9, 14:21:11
      - Debate? (NCFC) - Claygate_Canary, Mar 9, 15:15:18
- I cant access it from work. Can you copy your team please? (NCFC) - Claygate_Canary, Mar 9, 13:50:00
  - Hi Claygate... (NCFC) - canary_don, Mar 9, 14:02:33
    - thanks, its a good looking side (NCFC) - Claygate_Canary, Mar 9, 14:12:30
- Good Looking Side That... (NCFC) - Martin Peters, Mar 9, 13:47:52

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.