Happy to see he's backed more than anything
especially on a day when a main target of ours 3 years ago, scored on his debut for Phallus
Posted By: pants on January 3rd 2011 at 20:57:54
Message Thread
- lamberts signings...hit or miss? (NCFC) - conkers, Jan 3, 20:56:25
- there isn't a player there that when they've been given a chance (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 3, 21:13:34
- ** (NCFC) - lurd, Jan 3, 21:11:35
- I guess Oli was signed to help us out of League One, though: his contribution was valid. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 3, 21:31:50
- this (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 3, 21:36:53
- No goals since October. Only 4 in total. (NCFC) - lurd, Jan 3, 21:56:21
- guess so but he's adapting to a higher division and is part of a team/squad (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 3, 22:00:56
- No goals since October. Only 4 in total. (NCFC) - lurd, Jan 3, 21:56:21
- this (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 3, 21:36:53
- I guess Oli was signed to help us out of League One, though: his contribution was valid. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 3, 21:31:50
- from the little we have seen of surman he's a big hit (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Jan 3, 21:07:28
- all hits because they as a squad do what he asks of them. (n/m) (NCFC) - lovely old job, Jan 3, 20:58:21
- too often we have bought players who dont in the past (NCFC) - conkers, Jan 3, 21:03:20
- Happy to see he's backed more than anything (NCFC) - pants, Jan 3, 20:57:54
- true, guess the board have spent about 2 mill and deserve credit (n/m) (NCFC) - conkers, Jan 3, 21:00:10
- would say there's about 3.5m there (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 3, 21:03:20
- true, guess the board have spent about 2 mill and deserve credit (n/m) (NCFC) - conkers, Jan 3, 21:00:10
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.