As per above..........

There is no risk really. Only slightly to his reputation.

He could prove he wasnt driving, its not his job to prove who was driving.

Without his testimony the crown prosecution have nothing.

He could actually be telling the truth? ;-)

He might not know who was driving? ;-)

There is a small chance he has fallen out with his mates over this because they wouldn't say who was driving. :-D .... :-D ..... :-D ........ :-D

Posted By: usacanary on November 19th 2010 at 22:54:59

Message Thread

McNamee not guilty (NCFC) - Vivid Data Shark, Nov 19, 17:14:40
- thats just fucking bullshit (NCFC) - Tombs, Nov 19, 18:03:35
  - Huh? He proved he wasn't driving so he didn't want to grass his friend. (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 19, 19:47:04
    - Am I being nieve here... (NCFC) - DrDublin, Nov 19, 20:27:57
      - The mate who was driving may be banned, or already have enough points (NCFC) - Vivid Data Shark, Nov 19, 20:50:20
        
        ^^^ I am guessing this. (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 19, 22:44:07
        
        ^^^^ poor english, trying too hard not to post anything libelous (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 19, 22:47:35
        
        I suppose but if he had insurance and had money why risk it? (n/m) (NCFC) - DrDublin, Nov 19, 21:39:57
        
        As per above.......... (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 19, 22:54:59
        
        Also.... we are assuming........his 3 buds are not footballers! (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 19, 22:57:08
  - Law is a load of cack shocker (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Nov 19, 18:17:19
    - the law's fine (NCFC) - Tombs, Nov 19, 18:50:21
  - I was thinking it must be expensive to have an 'anyone insured policy' but then I suppose. (NCFC) - DrDublin, Nov 19, 18:05:30

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.