Doesn't the ref have a chance to rescind it first? Didn't someone say that
if so, then the fact that he hasn't suggests it won't be overturned. Personally I don't think it's a clear enough mistake
Posted By: Worzel Scrimmage on November 16th 2010 at 14:08:10
Message Thread
- Lets be honest here, its not going to be overturned. (NCFC) - megson, Nov 16, 14:04:34
- Agree with that (NCFC) - HoofinHughes, Nov 16, 14:19:45
- I agree (NCFC) - Malkys Head, Nov 16, 14:08:59
- Doesn't the ref have a chance to rescind it first? Didn't someone say that (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Nov 16, 14:08:10
- It's about as clear a mistake as you'll find imo (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Nov 16, 14:10:02
- not really, there was a foul, a man writhed on the floor, ref got a red out (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Nov 16, 14:13:53
- It's about as clear a mistake as you'll find imo (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Nov 16, 14:10:02
- martin n jackson will be a disaster.lamberts fault for having no cover (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Nov 16, 14:06:28
- Should of signed Sibierski (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Nov 16, 14:11:03
- MBK. Do you have any comment on this? ^^^ (n/m) (NCFC) - tudders, Nov 16, 14:24:38
- Sack him IMO. (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Nov 16, 14:07:12
- Should of signed Sibierski (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Nov 16, 14:11:03
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.