Lets be honest here, its not going to be overturned.
Far to humiliating for the FA to admit their golden boy has got it so badly wrong twice in quick sucession.
So do we have much confidence in a Martin and Jackson front 2?
Is that a pairing for the Diamond or a flat 442?
Posted By: megson on November 16th 2010 at 14:04:34
Message Thread
- Lets be honest here, its not going to be overturned. (NCFC) - megson, Nov 16, 14:04:34
- Agree with that (NCFC) - HoofinHughes, Nov 16, 14:19:45
- I agree (NCFC) - Malkys Head, Nov 16, 14:08:59
- Doesn't the ref have a chance to rescind it first? Didn't someone say that (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Nov 16, 14:08:10
- It's about as clear a mistake as you'll find imo (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Nov 16, 14:10:02
- not really, there was a foul, a man writhed on the floor, ref got a red out (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Nov 16, 14:13:53
- It's about as clear a mistake as you'll find imo (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Nov 16, 14:10:02
- martin n jackson will be a disaster.lamberts fault for having no cover (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Nov 16, 14:06:28
- Should of signed Sibierski (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Nov 16, 14:11:03
- MBK. Do you have any comment on this? ^^^ (n/m) (NCFC) - tudders, Nov 16, 14:24:38
- Sack him IMO. (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Nov 16, 14:07:12
- Should of signed Sibierski (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Nov 16, 14:11:03
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.