I dont think he would have even got on the bench to be honest.

Jonson and Svenny would have have been picked ahead of him, then you should really have a keeper and at least one defender, and a midfield player.

He is a legend, but i cant see how keeping him or Malky would have helped us

Posted By: Ashton4England on May 16th 2005 at 14:28:28

Message Thread

malky and Iwan (NCFC) - costanzas wig, May 16, 14:16:10
- the problem is not... (NCFC) - mr carra, May 16, 14:28:24
- it remains a mystery to me (NCFC) - Komodo, May 16, 14:18:56
- well said (n/m) (NCFC) - a scrimmage, May 16, 14:18:23
- i also think iwan would have been a useful sub (NCFC) - duke of york, May 16, 14:18:02
  - I dont think he would have even got on the bench to be honest. (NCFC) - Ashton4England, May 16, 14:28:28
  - To be fair, he would have been better than the doc up front (NCFC) - costanzas wig, May 16, 14:21:08
  - I'm obvioulsy a bit thick (NCFC) - Winged Eel Creosote, May 16, 14:19:52
    - i think malky wanted first team football (NCFC) - duke of york, May 16, 14:23:26
      - The problem with Fleming and Charlton (NCFC) - Winged Eel Creosote, May 16, 14:28:26
        
        horses for course - can't play them against crouch (NCFC) - duke of york, May 16, 14:32:17
        
        But this is the inflexibilty (NCFC) - Winged Eel Creosote, May 16, 14:39:41
      - My god (NCFC) - Pragmatist, May 16, 14:28:15
    - Here's your answer: (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, May 16, 14:20:41

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.