but isn't the gist that HMRC were too soft on Vodafone? - Wrath of the Barclay

but isn't the gist that HMRC were too soft on Vodafone?

if that were true, then HMRC's finding isn't exactly the clinching evidence, is it? Or am I missing something?

Posted By: Tricky Hawes on November 1st 2010 at 11:29:26

Message Thread

George Osbourne & Vodaphone (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Nov 1, 10:58:25
- except vodafone never owed 6bn and the full tax liability has been paid (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Nov 1, 11:27:30
  - but isn't the gist that HMRC were too soft on Vodafone? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Nov 1, 11:29:26
    - from what i'm hearing in accounting circles, they've paid their due. (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Nov 1, 11:33:14
    - Too soft and don't have the resources to go after them properly (n/m) (NCFC) - Fierce Panda, Nov 1, 11:30:49
      - If it helps keep them away from my door, I don't mind too much at the moment. (n/m) (NCFC) - tudders, Nov 1, 12:12:03
      - Even more so (NCFC) - Firstnews, Nov 1, 11:32:38
        
        silly boy (n/m) (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Nov 1, 11:37:54
        
        Whistles.......Ben my man, might be a case for removing this post.. (n/m) (NCFC) - mike_the_sphinx, Nov 1, 11:36:38
        
        Ok (NCFC) - Firstnews, Nov 1, 11:47:22
        
        We need OG back to brief people on British libel laws (NCFC) - mike_the_sphinx, Nov 1, 11:57:31
        
        .... (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Nov 1, 11:51:03
- Yes, but that is not as bad as (NCFC) - Firstnews, Nov 1, 11:10:30
  - Hard times indeed (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Nov 1, 11:23:24

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.