Just for that they ought to have some serious repercussions as a company.

I mean, if most companies did something like that they'd have hell to pay. Surely?

Or is there no justice? Do the rich really make the rules?

Oh right.

Posted By: APB on August 5th 2010 at 15:49:54

Message Thread

Pompey decision expected fairly soon. (Other Football) - megson, Aug 5, 14:42:32
- Pompey win, according to Roantwat. (Other Football) - Arizona Bay, Aug 5, 16:07:24
  - Oh well (Other Football) - yarmyyarmy, Aug 5, 16:09:31
- Either I haven't been paying attention or this is the first time I've seen this (Other Football) - BerlinCanary, Aug 5, 15:16:22
  - Yep, the FA introduced that rule (Other Football) - yarmyyarmy, Aug 5, 15:44:44
    - * sharp intake of breath * (Other Football) - Arizona Bay, Aug 5, 15:45:45
      - It's why HMRC think they are owed 37m instead of 24m (n/m) (Other Football) - yarmyyarmy, Aug 5, 15:47:37
        
        Just for that they ought to have some serious repercussions as a company. (Other Football) - APB, Aug 5, 15:49:54
        
        It's criminal, surely? "Tax evasion" rather than legal "avoidance"? (Other Football) - Arizona Bay, Aug 5, 15:55:39
        
        According to this, Joey Barton is being paid 675000 pa for his image rights by NUFC (Other Football) - yarmyyarmy, Aug 5, 15:54:35
        
        That makes such positive reading. I feel that the world is a better place. (Other Football) - APB, Aug 5, 16:02:42
- I thought this was an appeal already? (n/m) (Other Football) - yarmyyarmy, Aug 5, 14:43:42
  - No, this is a Challenge I think. (n/m) (Other Football) - megson, Aug 5, 14:45:19

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.