Either I haven't been paying attention or this is the first time I've seen this

"HMRC argued at a two-day hearing on Wednesday and Thursday that the CVA was 'unfair and seriously flawed' as it gave preference to football creditors, including players, who were able to claim up to 100% of monies owed them, while other creditors, including the Revenue, would receive much less."

Quite f**king right! No reason why football creditors should have preference over any others (hope they don't owe us any money...)

Posted By: BerlinCanary on August 5th 2010 at 15:16:22


Message Thread


Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.

Log in