Which is all fine, but you are making some fairly large assumptions that we have
been chasing the player for four years (or that we ever did want him - indeed the only reference still available is one where the manager is categorically saying he does not want to sign him).
Whilst an element of what you are saying may well hold true (and on that argument about not shelling out for players that out managers want is one i have never agreed with you on here - if the money is not there, the money is not there, what other clubs do you see spending more than us on players and wages etc etc...), rightly or wrongly, to the objective observer, it appears you are trying to make 'facts' about Ward fit your prejudicial opinions of the Board.
Posted By: Yellalee on May 26th 2010 at 18:09:33
Message Thread
- I don't know what all the arguing is about (General Chat) - Worzel Scrimmage, May 26, 17:18:44
- I had an opinion, people didn't like it (General Chat) - pants, May 26, 17:21:00
- that's probably pretty much it in a nutshell (General Chat) - Worzel Scrimmage, May 26, 17:31:31
- "I've witnessed it before" ^^^^^.....has a very reflective computer screen (n/m) (General Chat) - usacanary, May 26, 19:59:15
- We've signed a player we've tracked for years, and failed to sign (General Chat) - pants, May 26, 17:37:07
- he cost too much in the past as I recall (General Chat) - Worzel Scrimmage, May 26, 17:41:55
- Except it wasn't a winner for us 2 years ago, or 4 years ago (General Chat) - pants, May 26, 18:01:37
- Which is all fine, but you are making some fairly large assumptions that we have (General Chat) - Yellalee, May 26, 18:09:33
- pants mate, your point may be true BUT (General Chat) - Charles21, May 26, 18:03:36
- Stop sacking various management teams so frequently (General Chat) - pants, May 26, 18:08:16
- Serious question, other than Roeder (General Chat) - Charles21, May 26, 18:18:51
- It's not really about that (General Chat) - pants, May 26, 18:28:28
- ok, but then what is the mistake they are making with the Ward signing? (n/m) (General Chat) - Charles21, May 26, 18:34:12
- I haven't said it is a mistake (General Chat) - pants, May 26, 18:39:07
- p.s (General Chat) - Charles21, May 26, 18:34:55
- unanswered q's? (General Chat) - pants, May 26, 18:41:18
- yeah (General Chat) - Charles21, May 26, 18:47:30
- My god, I am thankful I have never seen that show (General Chat) - 1morepost4jame_sward, May 26, 19:48:16
- One portion of negative unproductive spite sir (General Chat) - pants, May 26, 19:58:25
- Not sure my post was to you, was it pants? (General Chat) - 1morepost4jame_sward, May 26, 20:06:11
- haha and he was moaning about a post he made to loj (General Chat) - SCC 28, May 26, 20:17:59
- Not sure my post was to you, was it pants? (General Chat) - 1morepost4jame_sward, May 26, 20:06:11
- why would I take offence? (General Chat) - Charles21, May 26, 19:49:55
- You gotta be careful around here sometimes (General Chat) - 1morepost4jame_sward, May 26, 19:51:54
- One portion of negative unproductive spite sir (General Chat) - pants, May 26, 19:58:25
- Haha wow, and I was pissed off with Season 5 (General Chat) - pants, May 26, 19:20:13
- oh and (General Chat) - pants, May 26, 19:36:35
- good attempt! (General Chat) - Charles21, May 26, 19:32:22
- oh yeah (General Chat) - pants, May 26, 19:39:43
- The island deffo didn't sink (General Chat) - Charles21, May 26, 19:41:56
- True, especially as that church was (General Chat) - pants, May 26, 19:50:47
- I felt pretty much the same about seasons 4,5 and 6 tbh (General Chat) - Charles21, May 26, 20:01:02
- True, especially as that church was (General Chat) - pants, May 26, 19:50:47
- The island deffo didn't sink (General Chat) - Charles21, May 26, 19:41:56
- oh yeah (General Chat) - pants, May 26, 19:39:43
- My god, I am thankful I have never seen that show (General Chat) - 1morepost4jame_sward, May 26, 19:48:16
- yeah (General Chat) - Charles21, May 26, 18:47:30
- unanswered q's? (General Chat) - pants, May 26, 18:41:18
- so you admit it's nothing to do with giving people a long run regardless (General Chat) - SCC 28, May 26, 18:32:11
- ok, but then what is the mistake they are making with the Ward signing? (n/m) (General Chat) - Charles21, May 26, 18:34:12
- It's not really about that (General Chat) - pants, May 26, 18:28:28
- if they fail to deliver, they get sacked (General Chat) - SCC 28, May 26, 18:11:37
- how about we stop hiring shit managers first? (n/m) (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, May 26, 18:09:44
- Serious question, other than Roeder (General Chat) - Charles21, May 26, 18:18:51
- yeah he thinks it's a mistake to not spend money we don't have (General Chat) - SCC 28, May 26, 18:07:38
- Making up opinion AGAIN! (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, May 26, 18:09:10
- erm (General Chat) - SCC 28, May 26, 18:12:21
- Crouch never ever wanted to sign for us on anything other than a loan (General Chat) - 1morepost4jame_sward, May 26, 18:16:50
- erm (General Chat) - SCC 28, May 26, 18:12:21
- Making up opinion AGAIN! (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, May 26, 18:09:10
- Stop sacking various management teams so frequently (General Chat) - pants, May 26, 18:08:16
- Except it wasn't a winner for us 2 years ago, or 4 years ago (General Chat) - pants, May 26, 18:01:37
- tbf roeder did actually deny wanting him (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, May 26, 17:40:39
- he cost too much in the past as I recall (General Chat) - Worzel Scrimmage, May 26, 17:41:55
- that's probably pretty much it in a nutshell (General Chat) - Worzel Scrimmage, May 26, 17:31:31
- me neither (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, May 26, 17:19:42
- I had an opinion, people didn't like it (General Chat) - pants, May 26, 17:21:00
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.