Definitely not

We're simply picking an infinitely better cricketer.

A fourth seamer probably only needs to bowl 15 to 20 overs in a day.

If Anderson takes 1-90 what else is he going to offer? He's a cast iron number 11 and fields like me.

Collingwood will score runs, hold on to catches and may take the odd wicket.

It has to be him.

Posted By: SherryEnema on September 8th 2005 at 10:57:06

Message Thread

collingwood - are we playing for the draw? (General Chat) - Dave in France, Sep 8, 10:50:36
- Definitely not (General Chat) - SherryEnema, Sep 8, 10:57:06
  - Good call Sherry! (n/m) (General Chat) - Kirrie, Sep 8, 11:04:51
  - agree with that (n/m) (General Chat) - Brandonio, Sep 8, 10:59:12
- but Anderson is crap (General Chat) - mr carra, Sep 8, 10:56:24
- No... (General Chat) - Jim Nasium, Sep 8, 10:55:36
- yeah but anderson is averaging 32 with ball in CC this season. that aint food enough (General Chat) - WICKERMAN, Sep 8, 10:52:35
  - anderson has never had a ball in me. (n/m) (General Chat) - camcan, Sep 8, 11:00:02
- could be. Mind you - (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Sep 8, 10:52:13

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.