That;s not their case
As I understand it, they say that they only gave permission to us to speak to Lamby on the basis that we would pay them big wongha compo. We then spoke to him but refused to pay, saying he'd resigned before we spoke so we didn't need to pay anything. Cue mass accusations of tapping up etc etc from Col Who.
I think they mostly want the said big wongha compo. But would also like some points taken off us for being naughty boys in the way we approached Lambo pour encourager les autres
Posted By: Old Git on April 27th 2010 at 12:45:30
Message Thread
- Why?.. (NCFC) - Fierce Panda, Apr 27, 12:25:37
- I will see what I can pick up on the grapevine (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 27, 12:40:10
- Nice one... (NCFC) - Fierce Panda, Apr 27, 12:44:08
- "Colchester's miserable record of one win in 12 league matches over the run-in" (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 27, 12:30:37
- i would of thought col utd engineered it thus (NCFC) - Tombs, Apr 27, 12:29:55
- because they've better things to do (NCFC) - camcan, Apr 27, 12:28:17
- That;s not their case (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 27, 12:45:30
- I'm not sure I follow (I'm jolly tired today) (n/m) (NCFC) - Fierce Panda, Apr 27, 12:29:47
- Well I presume that one of the things that irks (NCFC) - camcan, Apr 27, 12:42:36
- Belgrano... (NCFC) - Fierce Panda, Apr 27, 12:45:17
- Well I presume that one of the things that irks (NCFC) - camcan, Apr 27, 12:42:36
- I will see what I can pick up on the grapevine (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 27, 12:40:10
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.