mcnamee's goal did take a slight deflection but his play deserved a goal

as did grant holt's. stockport were spirited throughout (including up to goalie up for last minute corner) but did not do enough to warrant a point. we could have scored 5 but there you go.

Posted By: Tombs on April 5th 2010 at 22:41:43

Message Thread

McNamee goal should be deflected and Holt's goal on his skin? (n/m) (NCFC) - XXL16, Apr 5, 22:28:16
- McNamee goal should be deflected and Holt's goal on his shin? (n/m) (NCFC) - XXL16, Apr 5, 23:22:50
- pardon? (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Apr 5, 22:43:29
  - Oh Sorry! I mean his shin... (NCFC) - XXL16, Apr 5, 23:22:35
- Holt's goal on his foreskin? HORSE!!! (n/m) (NCFC) - songwriter, Apr 5, 22:43:16
- yes (NCFC) - Tombs, Apr 5, 22:31:58
  - haha, of course no but (NCFC) - XXL16, Apr 5, 22:36:02
    - mcnamee's goal did take a slight deflection but his play deserved a goal (NCFC) - Tombs, Apr 5, 22:41:43
      - Wow we miss so many chances in the 2nd half? (NCFC) - XXL16, Apr 5, 23:22:08

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.