why does someone mentioning a manager

many hated and thought was rubbish have to be an issue which you have to reply to?

people take the piss out of grant and hamilton too

would be a whole lot easier if you just ignore any criticism of your idol

mentioning him isn't some kind of message for you to come on to defend him and start blubbing

Posted By: SCC 28 on March 6th 2010 at 17:56:01

Message Thread

"Wes won a couple of headers too which we didn't know he could do" lol (NCFC) - megson, Mar 6, 17:43:57
- good banter (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 6, 17:44:43
  - Agreed, always a good sign. (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Mar 6, 17:49:30
  - he's no Roeder though, and (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Mar 6, 17:45:19
    - Uh oh!! (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Mar 6, 17:49:23
    - there goes pants again, going on about Roeder, he always starts this (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 17:47:13
      - agreed (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 6, 17:48:54
        
        correct example (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 17:52:29
        
        why does someone mentioning a manager (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 6, 17:56:01
        
        sticking up for roeder on here is as pointless (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 6, 17:59:56
        
        Give it a rest, will you? You know how it will end. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Mar 6, 17:56:50
        
        A full frontal, mass tag-team gay-off on tilt? (n/m) (NCFC) - Huge Small, Mar 6, 17:58:22
        
        lemon party (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 6, 18:31:42
        
        Yep. For a change. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Mar 6, 17:58:48
    - agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 6, 17:45:45

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.