correct example - Wrath of the Barclay

correct example

as I replied to someone bringing up the subject, which means I brought it up, which means it was my fault

Just like today

Posted By: pants on March 6th 2010 at 17:52:29

Message Thread

"Wes won a couple of headers too which we didn't know he could do" lol (NCFC) - megson, Mar 6, 17:43:57
- good banter (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 6, 17:44:43
  - Agreed, always a good sign. (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Mar 6, 17:49:30
  - he's no Roeder though, and (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Mar 6, 17:45:19
    - Uh oh!! (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Mar 6, 17:49:23
    - there goes pants again, going on about Roeder, he always starts this (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 17:47:13
      - agreed (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 6, 17:48:54
        
        correct example (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 17:52:29
        
        why does someone mentioning a manager (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 6, 17:56:01
        
        sticking up for roeder on here is as pointless (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 6, 17:59:56
        
        Give it a rest, will you? You know how it will end. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Mar 6, 17:56:50
        
        A full frontal, mass tag-team gay-off on tilt? (n/m) (NCFC) - Huge Small, Mar 6, 17:58:22
        
        lemon party (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 6, 18:31:42
        
        Yep. For a change. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Mar 6, 17:58:48
    - agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 6, 17:45:45

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.