I was looking at it from the other angle at the time

he came from behind Russell, who was clearly going for the ball.

if that's the only video though, then I doubt it will be overturned. They only tend to overturn things that are really obvious.

Posted By: jamesward on February 22nd 2010 at 14:54:18

Message Thread

any1 got a link to the russell send off please.havnt seen it again yet. cheers (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Feb 22, 14:26:39
- About 50 seconds (NCFC) - WOTB No1 Tipster 04, Feb 22, 14:35:25
  - Cannot play media. Sorry, this media is not available in your territory. (NCFC) - mike_the_sphinx, Feb 22, 14:47:53
    - Move to a proper country, Mike, where you can drink the water and everything (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 22, 14:51:15
      - Can drink the tapwater in Cairo believe it or not. Beers a bit dodgy though. (n/m) (NCFC) - mike_the_sphinx, Feb 22, 14:53:33
  - can't see that getting overturned (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 22, 14:39:59
    - Impossible to tell from that replay (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 22, 14:49:10
      - well i've played it back loads of times (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 22, 14:51:33
        
        The uncertainty lies (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 22, 14:53:20
        
        i think that's the best take on it tbh (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 22, 14:55:24
        
        Ref should be (NCFC) - jamesward, Feb 22, 14:57:34
        
        At the time, from my angle, that's exactly what happened (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Feb 22, 14:54:48
    - Troll (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Feb 22, 14:45:15
      - just saying what i saw (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 22, 14:49:32
    - disagreed (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 22, 14:41:36
      - you think it'll be overturned? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 22, 14:44:14
        
        I thought it was a foul on Russell (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Feb 22, 14:46:00
        
        must be a deceptive angle (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 22, 14:48:05
        
        I was looking at it from the other angle at the time (NCFC) - jamesward, Feb 22, 14:54:18
        
        can the ref change it from looking back? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 22, 14:56:24
        
        He could, but refs are generally (NCFC) - jamesward, Feb 22, 14:59:11
  - cheers. a joke decision (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Feb 22, 14:37:39
- what was your take on it selwyn? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 22, 14:35:20
  - was a wrongun (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Feb 22, 14:38:10
    - yeah reminded me of some classic bruce lee films (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 22, 14:40:20
      - Speeded up for effect? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 22, 14:41:10
        
        he really could punch that quick (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 22, 14:43:54
- no probs (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 22, 14:28:10
  - lol (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 22, 14:31:42
    - simple things please simple minds (: (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Feb 22, 14:33:39
      - ...while bigger fools look on? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 22, 14:36:09
        
        remember youre ment to be being civil (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Feb 22, 14:38:45
        
        I thought that was the second part of the phrase (NCFC) - pants, Feb 22, 14:40:11
        
        i duno (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Feb 22, 14:41:22
        
        oh (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 22, 14:43:20
      - :(): (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 22, 14:34:36

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.