The uncertainty lies

in the fact that the Saints player is running in from behind Rusty, so he may well not have seen him, was just stretching up for the ball in space, then the Saint arrives at the same time as the ball and *bang*

But you can't really tell from that reply if that's what happened. There's just a suggestion of it

Posted By: Old Git on February 22nd 2010 at 14:53:20

Message Thread

any1 got a link to the russell send off please.havnt seen it again yet. cheers (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Feb 22, 14:26:39
- About 50 seconds (NCFC) - WOTB No1 Tipster 04, Feb 22, 14:35:25
  - Cannot play media. Sorry, this media is not available in your territory. (NCFC) - mike_the_sphinx, Feb 22, 14:47:53
    - Move to a proper country, Mike, where you can drink the water and everything (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 22, 14:51:15
      - Can drink the tapwater in Cairo believe it or not. Beers a bit dodgy though. (n/m) (NCFC) - mike_the_sphinx, Feb 22, 14:53:33
  - can't see that getting overturned (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 22, 14:39:59
    - Impossible to tell from that replay (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 22, 14:49:10
      - well i've played it back loads of times (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 22, 14:51:33
        
        The uncertainty lies (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 22, 14:53:20
        
        i think that's the best take on it tbh (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 22, 14:55:24
        
        Ref should be (NCFC) - jamesward, Feb 22, 14:57:34
        
        At the time, from my angle, that's exactly what happened (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Feb 22, 14:54:48
    - Troll (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Feb 22, 14:45:15
      - just saying what i saw (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 22, 14:49:32
    - disagreed (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 22, 14:41:36
      - you think it'll be overturned? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 22, 14:44:14
        
        I thought it was a foul on Russell (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Feb 22, 14:46:00
        
        must be a deceptive angle (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 22, 14:48:05
        
        I was looking at it from the other angle at the time (NCFC) - jamesward, Feb 22, 14:54:18
        
        can the ref change it from looking back? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 22, 14:56:24
        
        He could, but refs are generally (NCFC) - jamesward, Feb 22, 14:59:11
  - cheers. a joke decision (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Feb 22, 14:37:39
- what was your take on it selwyn? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 22, 14:35:20
  - was a wrongun (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Feb 22, 14:38:10
    - yeah reminded me of some classic bruce lee films (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 22, 14:40:20
      - Speeded up for effect? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 22, 14:41:10
        
        he really could punch that quick (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 22, 14:43:54
- no probs (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 22, 14:28:10
  - lol (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 22, 14:31:42
    - simple things please simple minds (: (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Feb 22, 14:33:39
      - ...while bigger fools look on? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 22, 14:36:09
        
        remember youre ment to be being civil (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Feb 22, 14:38:45
        
        I thought that was the second part of the phrase (NCFC) - pants, Feb 22, 14:40:11
        
        i duno (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Feb 22, 14:41:22
        
        oh (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 22, 14:43:20
      - :(): (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 22, 14:34:36

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.