yeah i take your point with the implication
tho it was more about the pitch improving and not being in a terrible state before.
there are a lot of inconsistencies with what all parties have said. walsall claim the ref said it was playable at 1130. i haven't heard the ref deny this and other walsall people have reported the game got the go ahead too. a bit of spin going on imo. maybe walsall didn't think we'd have any issues with the surface given what happened against leyton orient.
Posted By: SCC 28 on December 28th 2009 at 23:07:33
Message Thread
- SCC - if you read the refs statement (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 28, 22:53:05
- yeah i take your point with the implication (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 23:07:33
- I guess Lambert did not see the pitch til we arrived (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 28, 23:12:29
- "made another enemy" (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 28, 23:42:46
- Oh....... and Happy New Year (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 28, 23:43:12
- yeah agree with all of that (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 23:23:25
- Givn our injuries I don't blame us if we did (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 28, 23:49:37
- Agreed, impressed with Lambo. We would have been plaing twice in 3 days, while (NCFC) - megson, Dec 29, 08:52:27
- Givn our injuries I don't blame us if we did (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 28, 23:49:37
- "made another enemy" (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 28, 23:42:46
- I guess Lambert did not see the pitch til we arrived (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 28, 23:12:29
- yeah i take your point with the implication (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 23:07:33
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.