SCC - if you read the refs statement
It implies very clearly that he did not deem the pitch safe at 11.30 because he says it was considerably worse at 11.30 than at 2pm when he declared it unsafe,
Bottom line is Wallsall should have flagged this up last night and there should have been a 10am pitch inspection and which point the ref should have called it of rather than give them more time to sort it out by burning barreks of fuel on the pitch!
If Lambo persuaded him to call it off then fair play to him though. as annoyed as I was having travelled we will have a much better chance of 3 points playing them with our full team in 3 or 4 weeks time.
Posted By: Jim on December 28th 2009 at 22:53:05
Message Thread
- SCC - if you read the refs statement (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 28, 22:53:05
- yeah i take your point with the implication (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 23:07:33
- I guess Lambert did not see the pitch til we arrived (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 28, 23:12:29
- "made another enemy" (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 28, 23:42:46
- Oh....... and Happy New Year (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 28, 23:43:12
- yeah agree with all of that (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 23:23:25
- Givn our injuries I don't blame us if we did (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 28, 23:49:37
- Agreed, impressed with Lambo. We would have been plaing twice in 3 days, while (NCFC) - megson, Dec 29, 08:52:27
- Givn our injuries I don't blame us if we did (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 28, 23:49:37
- "made another enemy" (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 28, 23:42:46
- I guess Lambert did not see the pitch til we arrived (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 28, 23:12:29
- yeah i take your point with the implication (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 23:07:33
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.