Simple question

laced with a touch of sarcasm.

As a well-known keyboard-warrior it is surprising that you failed to stick it to Souter's book when you had the chance.

If you state that Archant policy had nothing to do with your powder-puff review then obviously I can't argue with that.

My opinion of Archant is that their coverage is lazy, slipshod and falls short of what I would like to see.

Of course, bearing in mind your links with that organisation I would hardly expect you to agree.

Posted By: jayson blair on December 21st 2009 at 15:43:02

Message Thread

the book listed below which is loosely based on city and mentions 2 gay players (NCFC) - conkers, Dec 21, 14:18:45
- The idea of drugs in Great Yarmouth is totally unrealistic (n/m) (NCFC) - Buckscanary, Dec 21, 14:49:59
- Oh it's just made me want to read it all over again! (n/m) (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Dec 21, 14:30:41
- Now, if you want a novel about a fictional football club, please may I recommend (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Dec 21, 14:28:27
  - third world...third person (n/m) (NCFC) - Buckscanary, Dec 21, 14:53:57
- It was utter wank (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 21, 14:21:45
  - so you hated the book (NCFC) - jayson blair, Dec 21, 14:24:42
    - Afternoon Rick - you well?.. (NCFC) - Fierce Panda, Dec 21, 14:57:12
    - Thinly-veiled "can't believe my luck - I have another chance to stick it to Archant" (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Dec 21, 14:37:19
      - Wonder what his problem is with Archant (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 21, 14:46:09
        
        Simple question (NCFC) - jayson blair, Dec 21, 15:43:02
        
        I'm no lover of Archant. (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 21, 16:01:22
  - Were Lee strong and Chris Button shagging in it? (n/m) (NCFC) - stringersrevenge, Dec 21, 14:23:51

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.