I replied about fp's point about what the bnp achieved on the bbc. It was relevant because
it's what fp posted
You don't agree with me, and that's fine, but I'm not going to expand on the subject, I was just replying to something he mentioned in the post. I'm entitled to do that
And I'm entitled to politely ask you to stop wanting my opinion on something else
But you can't handle that
I've tried politely. I don't agree with you, and you don't agree with me. I'm respecting your point, why can't you respect mine and my wishes?
Why can't you just leave it at that? And why couldn't you do so in all of these replies?
I'm very interested in what you really have to save about the above, instead of attacking me because I didn't want to get into a debate with you
Posted By: pants on November 4th 2009 at 16:53:42
Message Thread
- BNP spokesman Simon Darby said... (General Chat) - Fierce Panda, Nov 4, 13:28:22
- If idiots had just let the other idiot speak, he have shown himself up (General Chat) - pants, Nov 4, 13:46:01
- except tat he isn't an idiot (he did get his degree at Cambridge) he's just a racist cunt (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Nov 4, 13:54:48
- It's just my opinion. You have a different one (General Chat) - pants, Nov 4, 14:28:07
- yours is based on some sort of assumption that he'd say that it doesn't matter how much (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Nov 4, 15:05:47
- It's not actually, which is why I bail from your remarks very early on (General Chat) - pants, Nov 4, 15:17:17
- out of interest, what do you expect him to say that would make him look an idiot then? (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Nov 4, 15:30:08
- I've replied to FP about what I think about what happened on QT (General Chat) - pants, Nov 4, 15:41:07
- if you don't want to discuss the topic again, don't post about it (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Nov 4, 15:59:37
- I replied about fp's point about what the bnp achieved on the bbc. It was relevant because (General Chat) - pants, Nov 4, 16:53:42
- and i was just replying to something that you posted in your post (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Nov 4, 17:12:07
- And I've said from the very begginning that I don't agree with you, and it's fine (General Chat) - pants, Nov 4, 17:14:24
- The answer is Scrampton, I've fucking got you, and you've fucking defence to it (General Chat) - pants, Nov 4, 17:15:37
- does this mean i just been pwned? (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Nov 4, 17:28:35
- It shows just how immense it is asking you to respect something you can't (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, Nov 4, 17:45:23
- To quote you above (General Chat) - pants, Nov 4, 17:58:11
- i've explained quite patiently to you why i disagree with your view on why letting Griffin (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Nov 4, 17:58:11
- I know you have, and I asked you to respect that I don't agree with you (General Chat) - pants, Nov 4, 18:01:01
- re-read this thread too (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Nov 4, 18:13:07
- I know you have, and I asked you to respect that I don't agree with you (General Chat) - pants, Nov 4, 18:01:01
- It shows just how immense it is asking you to respect something you can't (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, Nov 4, 17:45:23
- does this mean i just been pwned? (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Nov 4, 17:28:35
- The answer is Scrampton, I've fucking got you, and you've fucking defence to it (General Chat) - pants, Nov 4, 17:15:37
- And I've said from the very begginning that I don't agree with you, and it's fine (General Chat) - pants, Nov 4, 17:14:24
- and i was just replying to something that you posted in your post (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Nov 4, 17:12:07
- I replied about fp's point about what the bnp achieved on the bbc. It was relevant because (General Chat) - pants, Nov 4, 16:53:42
- if you don't want to discuss the topic again, don't post about it (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Nov 4, 15:59:37
- I've replied to FP about what I think about what happened on QT (General Chat) - pants, Nov 4, 15:41:07
- keep me out of this!! ;op (n/m) (General Chat) - Jumbo1, Nov 4, 15:29:38
- out of interest, what do you expect him to say that would make him look an idiot then? (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Nov 4, 15:30:08
- It's not actually, which is why I bail from your remarks very early on (General Chat) - pants, Nov 4, 15:17:17
- yours is based on some sort of assumption that he'd say that it doesn't matter how much (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Nov 4, 15:05:47
- It's just my opinion. You have a different one (General Chat) - pants, Nov 4, 14:28:07
- except tat he isn't an idiot (he did get his degree at Cambridge) he's just a racist cunt (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Nov 4, 13:54:48
- Have you shot anyone recently? (n/m) (General Chat) - Fierce Panda, Nov 4, 13:38:02
- I think it's time for my rest (n/m) (General Chat) - Fierce Panda, Nov 4, 13:38:42
- have you done a CeeBeeBees? (n/m) (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Nov 4, 13:34:55
- Blimey, he's not moved oop north has he? (n/m) (General Chat) - CB41, Nov 4, 13:39:59
- No I fucking haven't (n/m) (General Chat) - Fierce Panda, Nov 4, 13:41:16
- Blimey, he's not moved oop north has he? (n/m) (General Chat) - CB41, Nov 4, 13:39:59
- It's not the BBC's responsibility unless the government steps in (General Chat) - tim berry, Nov 4, 13:34:06
- If idiots had just let the other idiot speak, he have shown himself up (General Chat) - pants, Nov 4, 13:46:01
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.