I think the point is the guy without the shirt can battle possession with me

instead of just watching me to turn around and turn around, mind you I did hit him down, but I don't want to waste the corner or throw in, because the keeper was quite close to me,,,

Or at the end of the day, I did not step on the guy without the shirt...

Posted By: XXL16 on September 28th 2009 at 09:40:33

Message Thread

Well, you guys be the judge, was a it a foul? From 18 to 30 seconds of the video... (NCFC) - XXL16, Sep 28, 09:06:46
- no foul at all (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Sep 28, 10:39:35
- Looks OK to me David (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 28, 09:30:57
  - I think the point is the guy without the shirt can battle possession with me (NCFC) - XXL16, Sep 28, 09:40:33
    - Exactly (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 28, 09:44:00
      - Well I think so too, okay I have absolutely no attempt to play the ball but I still have (NCFC) - XXL16, Sep 28, 09:49:14
        
        He was VERY cunt (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 28, 09:51:24
        
        Well but sadly, NO WAY! I will never play against those cunts again! BUT, we (NCFC) - XXL16, Sep 28, 09:55:05
        
        I'm imagining that said in a 'how quaint' way (NCFC) - camcan, Sep 28, 09:53:25
- There's a bit of obstruction by the chubby lad in yellow shorts (n/m) (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Sep 28, 09:27:54
  - he was close enough to the ball to be deemed 'in control' (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Sep 28, 09:44:32
    - Okay I agree it's an obstrcution but will you call me a foul onto him (NCFC) - XXL16, Sep 28, 09:51:06
      - if it were obstruction (NCFC) - camcan, Sep 28, 09:54:18
        
        yes it is, I think, but they never seem to give indirect for it anymore. (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Sep 28, 09:58:52
        
        i don't think ref's can choose whether to give an indirect free-kick as direct... (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Sep 28, 10:00:39
        
        Well, thanks for the opinion... (NCFC) - XXL16, Sep 28, 09:58:16
        
        ah Ken Dodd's etc down there says the same (NCFC) - camcan, Sep 28, 09:59:41
  - I was in green shorts and yellow socks (all Norwich) (NCFC) - XXL16, Sep 28, 09:42:28
    - Damn! I meant green shorts... (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Sep 28, 09:52:22
      - Yeah I think I should hoof it but he shoot the ball and deflected me, and my goalie (NCFC) - XXL16, Sep 28, 09:57:14
  - which one? (n/m) (NCFC) - Tombs, Sep 28, 09:28:45
- ^^^gally doherty (n/m) (NCFC) - Tombs, Sep 28, 09:20:04
  - I don't pull his shirt (NCFC) - XXL16, Sep 28, 09:21:35
    - i think you'll find that over the course of a season these things tend to iron themselves (NCFC) - Tombs, Sep 28, 09:28:26
      - Oh no, what does it mean>? (n/m) (NCFC) - XXL16, Sep 28, 09:42:56
- If video evidence has ever been more clearcut I'll be surprised (NCFC) - UtterlyHuckerby, Sep 28, 09:13:57
  - It's definitately a strong argument for using video technology in the modern game (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Sep 28, 09:44:43
    - Yeah but I mean you guys not in the game, and I think it is fresh for you guys to see it (NCFC) - XXL16, Sep 28, 09:50:02
      - It's obstruction - indirect free kick. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Sep 28, 09:56:47
        
        Never gets given, though, never ever ever (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 28, 09:58:28
  - I admit it, but if you are the ref, will you blow the whistle and say I foul him? (NCFC) - XXL16, Sep 28, 09:17:13
    - I suggest you calm down and immerse yourself in pizza (NCFC) - UtterlyHuckerby, Sep 28, 09:18:53
      - Well that's means you say you will give a red card and a pen (NCFC) - XXL16, Sep 28, 09:21:08

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.