No. My mistake.

Got a bit confused doing three things at once there - four if you include the drinking.

Had read the scum vs mini scum post and didn't know who Ips**t were playing and must have thought that was the start of the thread I replied to...probably also didn't notice that there was two different posters involved in the Posh are scum bit of it all.

Oh well.

Still, none of which has left me any clearer as to wwhy either of you consider them scum. Do you consider Cambridge scum too? And Colchester? And Southend? And Kings Lynn? Etc etc......

Posted By: DJ Ginga on August 25th 2009 at 22:34:31

Message Thread

Peterborough 2 - 1 Ipswich (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Aug 25, 21:14:36
- 2.1 bugger (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Aug 25, 21:15:39
  - bugger? Surely a good thin, although P'boro are the baby scum (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 25, 21:28:15
    - Why? (n/m) (NCFC) - DJ Ginga, Aug 25, 21:56:19
      - dunno, they just are (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 25, 22:04:51
        
        Not exactly... (NCFC) - DJ Ginga, Aug 25, 22:10:02
        
        Why did you link to the top of the thread? (n/m) (NCFC) - DJ Ginga, Aug 25, 22:10:51
        
        I didn't, I posted a link to another thread where someone else referred to them as scum (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 25, 22:19:01
        
        Check your link. (NCFC) - DJ Ginga, Aug 25, 22:28:35
        
        No. My mistake. (NCFC) - DJ Ginga, Aug 25, 22:34:31
        
        oh no, just Posh. And Bury town (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 25, 22:44:20
    - bugger as in I posted after LC and got the score wrong! (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Aug 25, 21:29:58
      - aha haha (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 25, 21:31:03

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.