Definition of "best" with respect to Hoolahan

After a not very encouraging start he played well in a couple of games and then got injured just before the run in and so is not tarred with the relegation brush.

Posted By: BerlinCanary on August 5th 2009 at 10:30:46

Message Thread

So Roeder was correct then (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Aug 5, 09:42:26
- Yes, Roeder was right... (NCFC) - tim berry, Aug 5, 13:10:41
- oh he meant a hero for league one? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 5, 09:48:42
  - Roeder didn't relegated us (NCFC) - pants, Aug 5, 12:21:36
  - Does it matter what division we're in? he is now without doubt (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Aug 5, 10:11:44
    - I think he is with great doubt our "best" player. (NCFC) - sheffieldcanary, Aug 5, 10:26:40
      - OK fair enough..most talented, but if best is decided at end (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Aug 5, 10:45:32
        
        If talent equals someone who can "flick, fart and fanny" then yeah I guess he is. (n/m) (NCFC) - sheffieldcanary, Aug 5, 10:57:57
        
        No Hoolahan has the kind of ability that most of our players (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Aug 5, 11:35:39
        
        Quite the opposite for me (NCFC) - Brandonio, Aug 5, 10:50:51
      - Definition of "best" with respect to Hoolahan (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Aug 5, 10:30:46
- No. Because he was talking about heroes last sesason. There weren't any. (n/m) (NCFC) - sheffieldcanary, Aug 5, 09:47:54
- We knew Roeder was right, (NCFC) - NCFC4life, Aug 5, 09:43:21

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.