Yes it would
Could if it isn't him it would have proved Pants wrong.
Which is the whole point of this messageboard isn't?
Posted By: Ken Dodds Dads Dog on July 15th 2009 at 12:43:21
Message Thread
- Coudl I just point out (General Chat) - Old Git, Jul 15, 12:18:50
- Lovely work OG (General Chat) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Jul 15, 12:33:31
- Look...... (General Chat) - Johnny Comecardiff, Jul 15, 12:28:17
- but, IF you were..... (General Chat) - Tombs, Jul 15, 12:35:57
- Yes it would (General Chat) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Jul 15, 12:43:21
- *because not could, add and 'it' at the end. (General Chat) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Jul 15, 12:46:20
- *an not and. ffs. (n/m) (General Chat) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Jul 15, 12:46:45
- *because not could, add and 'it' at the end. (General Chat) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Jul 15, 12:46:20
- Yes it would (General Chat) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Jul 15, 12:43:21
- Yes, you can SAY that (General Chat) - Old Git, Jul 15, 12:30:43
- Equally, you need proof the other way. (General Chat) - Johnny Comecardiff, Jul 15, 12:32:04
- Well we do have a witness (General Chat) - Old Git, Jul 15, 12:37:45
- Oh. (General Chat) - Johnny Comecardiff, Jul 15, 12:45:51
- Well we do have a witness (General Chat) - Old Git, Jul 15, 12:37:45
- Equally, you need proof the other way. (General Chat) - Johnny Comecardiff, Jul 15, 12:32:04
- but, IF you were..... (General Chat) - Tombs, Jul 15, 12:35:57
- ... (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Jul 15, 12:25:26
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.