seems to me that the experiment contains far too many flaws
to draw any significant conclusions whatsoever. They measured how often the subjects "looked at the speaker"? That could indicate any number of things.
Picky you might say, but I do hold a degree in Zoology
Posted By: Worzel Scrimmage on July 9th 2009 at 18:08:54
Message Thread
- See OG and cancan are in good company (General Chat) - DNB41, Jul 9, 17:58:27
- seems to me that the experiment contains far too many flaws (General Chat) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jul 9, 18:08:54
- Bono you don't (n/m) (General Chat) - Tombs, Jul 9, 18:17:03
- sadly I do (General Chat) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jul 9, 18:48:45
- Indeed, but not really relevant in the "having a dig at OG" stakes. (General Chat) - DNB41, Jul 9, 18:13:05
- agreed, but then I did just butt in without any prior knowledge of what was gannin on (n/m) (General Chat) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jul 9, 18:48:14
- Bono you don't (n/m) (General Chat) - Tombs, Jul 9, 18:17:03
- seems to me that the experiment contains far too many flaws (General Chat) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jul 9, 18:08:54
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.