bit wew have to assume that the content wasn't taken out of context

I doubt the Times would risk printing such damning stuff otherwise.
I'd imagine that the missing material wasn't interesting at all, hence it's omission

Posted By: Worzel Scrimmage on July 4th 2009 at 22:14:44


Message Thread


Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.

Log in