only if
they have a suitably short notice period you can use, a convenient break clause, or a termination provision that is operative.
Otherwise it's a fecking expensive claim for wrongly sacking them.
Sadly I don't suppose Cureton has a 'the employee shall at all times be capable of hitting a cow's backside with a banjo' type clause that we could get him on.
Posted By: CWC on June 25th 2009 at 14:39:50
Message Thread
- Now look what we've done, claiming our rebate! (NCFC) - BSE Canary, Jun 25, 13:23:42
- Yet Mr Cureton still rakes in thousands a week (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 25, 13:30:12
- non-performers on high wages (NCFC) - camcan, Jun 25, 13:37:01
- ^^^ guilty ^^^ (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 25, 13:49:54
- It's expensive to sack people on high wages (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 25, 13:32:10
- No it's not, it doesn't cost a penny (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Jun 25, 14:02:24
- only if (NCFC) - CWC, Jun 25, 14:39:50
- Surely sacking is instantaneous and without compensation. (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Jun 25, 14:51:28
- only if (NCFC) - CWC, Jun 25, 14:39:50
- No it's not, it doesn't cost a penny (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Jun 25, 14:02:24
- Probably the girl in accounts getting the chop (n/m) (NCFC) - BSE Canary, Jun 25, 13:31:21
- non-performers on high wages (NCFC) - camcan, Jun 25, 13:37:01
- Yet Mr Cureton still rakes in thousands a week (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 25, 13:30:12
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.