non-performers on high wages

sad but true. Paying off Jamie is going to be a lot more expensive than paying off Annabel in accounts. The club has paid off quite a few players over the last few years. Out of the playing budget. The playing budget that the rebate is going into. So all the superiority being displayed on here by the rebate donors might pay up Jamie Cureton's contract. Super.

Posted By: camcan on June 25th 2009 at 13:37:01

Message Thread

Now look what we've done, claiming our rebate! (NCFC) - BSE Canary, Jun 25, 13:23:42
- Yet Mr Cureton still rakes in thousands a week (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 25, 13:30:12
  - non-performers on high wages (NCFC) - camcan, Jun 25, 13:37:01
    - ^^^ guilty ^^^ (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 25, 13:49:54
  - It's expensive to sack people on high wages (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 25, 13:32:10
    - No it's not, it doesn't cost a penny (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Jun 25, 14:02:24
      - only if (NCFC) - CWC, Jun 25, 14:39:50
        
        Surely sacking is instantaneous and without compensation. (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Jun 25, 14:51:28
  - Probably the girl in accounts getting the chop (n/m) (NCFC) - BSE Canary, Jun 25, 13:31:21

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.