you see

I struggle to join in with this joke, because I do think Hucks was treated disgracefully. And what happened there was fairly indicative of the state of the club in terms of ludicrous decision-making.
This isn't a 'if we'd had Hucks we'd have had 85 points' defence - but it is annoyance that we've trivialised something that did reflect on bigger things at the club.

Posted By: camcan on June 9th 2009 at 17:36:02

Message Thread

Bit of negativity around the Gill signing which I can understand because (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jun 9, 17:15:32
- personally i reckon we ought to be getting a shit load of players in from the Premier Leag (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jun 9, 17:29:50
  - and serie a and la liga too. (NCFC) - camcan, Jun 9, 17:30:37
    - he'd never have turned us down if Hucks was still here (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jun 9, 17:31:32
      - you see (NCFC) - camcan, Jun 9, 17:36:02
        
        i can see where you're coming from tbh (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jun 9, 17:53:45
        
        I'm not angry (NCFC) - camcan, Jun 9, 17:55:18
        
        ultimate decision makers yes, but not the ones that decided to dump Huck in the way that h (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jun 9, 17:59:14
        
        Don't know (NCFC) - camcan, Jun 9, 18:01:39
        
        well that's sort of my reading of the Munby 'Norwich people' type quotes (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jun 9, 18:14:28
        
        exactly (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 9, 17:58:34
        
        Bugger (NCFC) - camcan, Jun 9, 17:59:52
        
        POTD (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 9, 17:40:49
- I dont thinks its negativity (NCFC) - Klobo04, Jun 9, 17:19:52
- it's not negativity (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 9, 17:17:13
- can't see too much negativity (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 9, 17:16:32

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.