correct, Hooly, Clingers, Bell and Stef,

none of them useless (admittedly not as good as Hucks in his prime, but certainly not useless)

Bell deserting us (and not being allowed to have the surgery he needed when he needed it) are seperate matters - but if we hadn't been relegated those 4 represented good buys for the club and a solid foundation for moving the squad as a whole forward

Posted By: Ralf Scrampton on May 20th 2009 at 11:55:35

Message Thread

Question. Will Norwich ever get over Huckerby? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 20, 11:05:28
- We would have got over him months ago IF.. Your mate Roeder (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, May 20, 11:46:37
  - i disagree with almost all of that ^^^ (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, May 20, 11:47:54
    - Ok simple terms......... (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, May 20, 11:51:17
      - ok that's fair enough (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, May 20, 11:59:34
    - so the new heroes weren't useless? (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 20, 11:49:40
      - correct, Hooly, Clingers, Bell and Stef, (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, May 20, 11:55:35
        
        hoolahan was useless for us under roeder (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 20, 11:58:13
        
        Bell was injured for the entire time he was with us yet still put in MotM performances (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, May 20, 12:05:42
        
        did he?? (NCFC) - Charles21, May 20, 12:12:29
        
        If they were so good how come we didnt improve? (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, May 20, 11:58:06
        
        because we had a shit team as a whole (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, May 20, 12:03:26
        
        So therefore it could have been wrong to release a man with exceptional individual talent? (n/m) (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, May 20, 12:05:14
        
        i don't think i've said otherwise have i? (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, May 20, 12:11:18
        
        Look, the original point was will we ever get over Hucks? (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, May 20, 12:14:32
        
        you are right, that is the original question (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, May 20, 12:19:43
        
        but we weren't promoted as champions (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 20, 12:22:02
        
        "but we weren't promoted as champions" not a lot gets past you does it?... (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, May 20, 12:28:39
        
        i'm as shrewd as they come (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 20, 12:29:39
      - and huckerby was treated well and with respect? (n/m) (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, May 20, 11:51:46
- No then (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 20, 11:42:34
  - We would have done if you hadn't brought it up (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, May 20, 11:43:36
- It's a fucking disgrace! If we would of have kept him we would have of been in the (NCFC) - malkybarkid, May 20, 11:24:38
  - I think we'd have been playing Barca in Rome if we'd kept him. (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, May 20, 11:39:41
  - yebbut look on the Mr brightside we are only 2 leagues off that. (n/m) (NCFC) - lovely old job, May 20, 11:27:35
- get over what? (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 20, 11:16:35
  - It was an utter disgrace (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, May 20, 11:18:27
  - Question: Will Norwich ever recover from Glenn Roeders poison of the club? (n/m) (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, May 20, 11:17:29
    - Glenn Roeder was not the problem nor solution. (NCFC) - NCFC4life, May 20, 11:19:37
      - He was not THE problem but he was A problem. (NCFC) - nixon, May 20, 11:37:12
      - he was not the start but he furthered it!! Then again no other club in the country (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, May 20, 11:32:54
        
        amen brother!!!!!!!!!!! (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 20, 11:35:40
      - correct. And we weren't in the bottom 3 when he was fired (NCFC) - pants, May 20, 11:24:18
        
        Wasn't that on goal difference? With Barnsley having two or three games in hand? (NCFC) - Old Git, May 20, 11:31:58
        
        I am dealing in the facts (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 20, 11:43:29
        
        You are trolling (NCFC) - Old Git, May 20, 11:47:33
        
        actually, I didn't even bring it up. Another fact (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 20, 12:04:10
        
        O RLY (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 20, 12:05:01
        
        and accumulating less points per game is not an improvement either (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 20, 11:48:41
        
        "fewer" points (NCFC) - Old Git, May 20, 11:56:15
        
        it helps a lot thank you (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 20, 12:00:04
        
        a fact which means fuck all (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 20, 11:45:30
        
        Despite spending MILLIONS on player wages and loan fees (n/m) (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, May 20, 11:33:59
        
        also gunn didn't have lita to bang the goals in (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 20, 11:35:11
        
        on goal difference, with Doncaster having a game in hand and them only 2 points behind (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, May 20, 11:33:28
        
        Can you find a link to the table when Roeder was sacked? (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, May 20, 11:38:47
        
        why yes i can (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, May 20, 11:40:40
        
        That was clever, thank you (NCFC) - Old Git, May 20, 11:45:20
        
        Isn't his main point that replacing Roeder with Gunn for the rest of the season was the (NCFC) - Calvin Phillips, May 20, 11:55:23
        
        I think you'll find his main point is to troll. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, May 20, 11:59:31
        
        well he makes that same shit point on a weekly basis (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 20, 11:46:25
        
        but we got more points per game this season after he was sacked (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 20, 11:27:14
        
        How many more? 0.0000001? (NCFC) - Calvin Phillips, May 20, 11:32:06
        
        good lgic (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, May 20, 11:46:54
        
        why would it happen anyway? (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 20, 11:33:48
      - he was obviously a huge problem (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 20, 11:21:11
        
        and neither was Gunn, of course. But we did get our Club back... (n/m) (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, May 20, 11:27:45
        
        only a small part (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 20, 11:29:19
        
        I get it - keep digging, and we'll eventually find the Club at the bottom of the hole (n/m) (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, May 20, 11:36:45
        
        thanks to delia, grant and roeder (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 20, 11:37:37
    - defo (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 20, 11:18:28
- no, so long as he's always hanging around, (NCFC) - NCFC4life, May 20, 11:12:23
  - perhaps he is paying us to look after him (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, May 20, 11:31:24
  - Doesn't cost the club anything to treat him, does it? (NCFC) - Old Git, May 20, 11:30:58
    - Look at OG pretending he knows what World of Warcraft is. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, May 20, 11:44:37
  - oh ffs (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 20, 11:17:27
    - As usual, a rational and well informed reply from you. (NCFC) - NCFC4life, May 20, 11:21:06
      - lol (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 20, 11:23:26
      - how was it irrational? (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 20, 11:21:58
        
        you suggested hucks being at colney (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 20, 11:22:59
    - That'sDoncaster apparently (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, May 20, 11:19:53
  - He must have some sort of insurance (n/m) (NCFC) - Calvin Phillips, May 20, 11:14:34
    - Either that or the shermans ought to be paying. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, May 20, 11:17:23
      - WTF have the Germans got to do with it? (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, May 20, 11:19:20
        
        shermans, not chermans. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, May 20, 11:20:51
        
        Ah, Merkins (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, May 20, 11:26:37
- He's a bit like a bird you'd like to have a go on again, (NCFC) - Calvin Phillips, May 20, 11:09:19
- Yes (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, May 20, 11:07:34

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.