I see
I agree with you re - Taylor and Iversen.
If we had both of them, i doubt we'd have gone down (no matter what manager was in charge, Roeder or Gunn(
But at the same time, if the board had already made every single last penny they had availible for those transfers, then those two players were out of our reach.
There has to be a line somewhere in respect to how much they can make free for the manager, you never know it could have been Roeder saying he didnt think they were worth more than they were offering.
Posted By: HoofinHughes on May 4th 2009 at 12:45:36
Message Thread
- My brother has religiously worn his "lucky" underpayments (NCFC) - bowfront1, May 4, 11:40:41
- I still maintain a lot of the rot is set in from the moment they bought the club (NCFC) - pants, May 4, 11:50:40
- right, so the problem is that Delia and MWJ don't have limitless amounts of cash (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, May 4, 11:58:58
- All clubs miss out on transfer targets (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, May 4, 11:53:56
- not this again, PLEASE?! (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, May 4, 11:58:49
- cheers marvin (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 4, 11:58:30
- He had a good point, why not reply to him properly? (n/m) (NCFC) - HoofinHughes, May 4, 12:30:01
- past experiences (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 4, 12:37:17
- I see (NCFC) - HoofinHughes, May 4, 12:45:36
- in the case of Taylor it was Roeder that didn't want to pay what Brum were initially askin (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, May 4, 13:10:41
- Didn't the relationship between Roeder and Brady get a little... 'strained' too (NCFC) - HoofinHughes, May 4, 14:31:32
- i pretty sure that was during (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, May 4, 14:46:28
- Didn't the relationship between Roeder and Brady get a little... 'strained' too (NCFC) - HoofinHughes, May 4, 14:31:32
- in the case of Taylor it was Roeder that didn't want to pay what Brum were initially askin (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, May 4, 13:10:41
- I see (NCFC) - HoofinHughes, May 4, 12:45:36
- past experiences (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 4, 12:37:17
- that's your response to somewhat engaging with a post of yours? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, May 4, 11:59:44
- He had a good point, why not reply to him properly? (n/m) (NCFC) - HoofinHughes, May 4, 12:30:01
- Roeder (NCFC) - duke of york, May 4, 11:51:58
- (How do you religiously wear underpants, by the way?) (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, May 4, 11:41:43
- Chastity Belt... (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, May 4, 11:48:53
- Oh yes, of course. (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, May 4, 11:51:02
- Chastity Belt... (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, May 4, 11:48:53
- Well I think we've pretty much established that the fans are to blame. So probably. (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, May 4, 11:41:13
- Delia might well sieze on this............ (n/m) (NCFC) - bowfront1, May 4, 11:42:11
- I doubt it. (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, May 4, 11:48:25
- I've already apologised for that, so can we move on? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, May 4, 11:41:48
- Delia might well sieze on this............ (n/m) (NCFC) - bowfront1, May 4, 11:42:11
- I still maintain a lot of the rot is set in from the moment they bought the club (NCFC) - pants, May 4, 11:50:40
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.