My beef with you, is probably the same you have with me
is we're at stalemate over the bell thing, you think you're right, and I don't think you are
I've been fine with it, and I even said I was, but from my point of view I'm not the needing to let go of things
New days are new days to me, I don't that often bring up something said from someone days or weeks before, and use to them to justify a current comment. Which is something that is levelled at me all the time ie "well, this is pants you're talking to, someone who now claims he won't reason with anyone on here anymore"
Can you see where I'm coming from?
The reason I don't reason with you in the main, is because I'm waiting for you to let go from the Bell thing. The Lee thing yesterday, clearly shows that you haven't. I don't understand why you brought that post up, and I don't understand what I've said in that post that needs bringing up for as a laugh
In that reply, you've also incinuated that I don't what us to sign Alan Lee, which is something I haven't said at all. I've always wanted us to sign him. That's half my problem sometimes, I like players even if they're from other teams. It amazes me that I'm levelled (admittedly through 'banter') as someone who doesn't want him playing here. Yet last season if a thread started on here saying "if Alan Lee transferred here would you be happy?", if I replied yes, I'd probably get the same amount of grief as I have done today, as well as a little about not like him which I got yesterday
You probably think I've misinterpreted some things above
I'm at a point where I have been not replying to your threads recently, cos I'm just aware of, of where it might lead, ie again, if I clarify what I mean, you might just go "oh, but you are the kind of user on here that does x and x and x and x"
It's the whole culture on here where I have to be put down no matter what I think
To me, this is payback from you, over the Bell thing, whcih is why I've said from time to time that I understand why you won't let it go
I'm not saying it all is, and it's the only issue you have, clearly that's not the case, but when I see you reply to me with tinted age that's going down the road of smugness, all I can visualise, is me clarifying what I mean, and you coming back with something I've said before
Don't you find if amazing how it's been totally fine for you do the little bobby eagle thing for a laugh, something I've accepted, and others, yet one saturday on here for the first time, I used it, and I wasn't even having a go at the lad, and I got a wash of s**t from suggy about it?
It didn't surprise me at all, mainly because, although you have a slight point that I'm over sensitive, there is a great heap load of "just because you're paranoid doesn't mean people aren't trying to get at you" going on
It's just it's so easy to get into groups and just go "it is all pants you know, just hammer at him, he's obviously too weak to know any better"
That's where I walk away from threads, not because I'm beyond reasoning, I'm just more wary of what the real intentions are
My over sensitive follows in what you probably see as banter from there on
Posted By: pants on April 16th 2009 at 18:55:50
Message Thread
- Pants - It is no more likely to "kick off" at PR with the slighly later kick off.... (NCFC) - Superstar D J, Apr 16, 12:07:53
- Most people dont have a clue about matters relating to NCFC as they dont go to games" (NCFC) - megson, Apr 16, 12:51:16
- Agreed. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Apr 16, 13:37:12
- It may well be true (NCFC) - Bryan Salad Surgery, Apr 16, 13:05:36
- Too much sense in that post i'm afraid. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Apr 16, 12:53:58
- how's the prediction league looking? (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 16, 12:56:34
- dear oh dear (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 16, 12:30:12
- Not really Mikey.... (NCFC) - Superstar D J, Apr 16, 12:42:04
- oh yeah not having a go regards tasteless stuff (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 16, 12:46:07
- would one of those fans be the drunk one who sat near you in the second... (NCFC) - Superstar D J, Apr 16, 12:49:27
- Would not 'happily shooting someone in the face' (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 12:47:40
- not if they deserved it (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 16, 12:48:23
- You should run for parliament (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 12:50:04
- you say that in jest (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 16, 12:52:31
- The Brighton Taliban (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 12:54:17
- you probably need a degree (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 16, 12:53:56
- ha ha (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 16, 12:52:27
- you say that in jest (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 16, 12:52:31
- You should run for parliament (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 12:50:04
- not if they deserved it (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 16, 12:48:23
- It was only three or four people (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 12:43:20
- look on any internet forum (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 16, 12:46:50
- No debate can intelligently be had on the internet (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 12:48:56
- except for a MA..................... no no, i'm not going to do that one. (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Apr 16, 12:53:11
- No debate can intelligently be had on the internet (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 12:48:56
- look on any internet forum (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 16, 12:46:50
- oh yeah not having a go regards tasteless stuff (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 16, 12:46:07
- Not really Mikey.... (NCFC) - Superstar D J, Apr 16, 12:42:04
- wooosh! (n/m) (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Apr 16, 12:13:33
- Oooooooooo look at Mr Norwich Knowall!!! (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 16, 12:11:44
- Aye, soz you went to the effort here (NCFC) - pants, Apr 16, 12:10:53
- when was it last at 5:45? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 16, 12:24:51
- Excellent choice of troll (NCFC) - pants, Apr 16, 12:34:36
- what the fuck? (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 16, 12:38:54
- Ahh, you want an extra side salad of denial too (NCFC) - pants, Apr 16, 12:52:32
- Nah, coldplay was a hom (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 12:54:35
- do one grandpa (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 16, 12:56:01
- i thought this was banter (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 16, 12:53:15
- Denial? (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 16, 12:55:29
- Denial of trolling actually (NCFC) - pants, Apr 16, 12:56:49
- trolling by asking you to back up what you've said? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 16, 12:58:09
- pants did (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 16, 12:56:09
- Denial of trolling actually (NCFC) - pants, Apr 16, 12:56:49
- Denial? (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 16, 12:55:29
- Nah, coldplay was a hom (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 12:54:35
- i remember we used to be on around 8 back in the day (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 16, 12:41:16
- yes it used to be a late night kick off (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 16, 12:44:08
- Because you want me to have a benny every time I post, which is why you two reply (NCFC) - pants, Apr 16, 12:55:50
- ...and that Pants is why this forum has gone down ****er. (n/m) (NCFC) - Superstar D J, Apr 16, 12:57:45
- I agree totally (NCFC) - pants, Apr 16, 12:59:36
- yeah you're that important (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 16, 13:00:49
- because pants said something that wasn't agreed with? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 16, 12:58:38
- I agree totally (NCFC) - pants, Apr 16, 12:59:36
- i think he just wants you to clarify (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 16, 12:57:37
- haha - that actually made me laugh (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 13:01:21
- you post more often than anyone (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 16, 12:57:03
- I think (NCFC) - pants, Apr 16, 13:01:39
- mate, have a read of this thread and see who the cock is (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 16, 13:04:10
- Wasn't the game that kicked off at 11.30 moved because of Sky ? (NCFC) - Arganth, Apr 16, 13:33:10
- um, pedantry has nothing to do with pants original point being wrong (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 16, 13:36:58
- Personal opinion here... (NCFC) - Arganth, Apr 16, 13:46:38
- you may be right (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 16, 14:01:31
- No I agree with that totally. (NCFC) - Arganth, Apr 16, 14:10:18
- and if (hypothetically speaking) it suited Sky but not the police? (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 16, 14:15:25
- I would imagine the police have set a window in which they will accept... (NCFC) - Arganth, Apr 16, 14:29:37
- it would seem that only one poster would disagree with that... (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 16, 14:39:25
- I would imagine the police have set a window in which they will accept... (NCFC) - Arganth, Apr 16, 14:29:37
- and if (hypothetically speaking) it suited Sky but not the police? (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 16, 14:15:25
- No I agree with that totally. (NCFC) - Arganth, Apr 16, 14:10:18
- you may be right (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 16, 14:01:31
- Personal opinion here... (NCFC) - Arganth, Apr 16, 13:46:37
- i agree with the first 2 paragraphs of that (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 16, 14:12:06
- I reckon there is a clause in Sky's contract... (NCFC) - Arganth, Apr 16, 14:57:40
- He SAID 5:45 (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 16, 15:35:14
- I was being hypothetical, and you know I was (NCFC) - pants, Apr 16, 18:04:51
- perhaps there is (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 16, 15:19:29
- another fucking idiot (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Apr 16, 16:08:57
- for not understanding you? (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 16, 16:18:39
- Like when you used a post about Alan Lee that I made (NCFC) - pants, Apr 16, 17:32:35
- actually (NCFC) - pants, Apr 16, 17:50:54
- jesus fucking christ pants (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 16, 17:48:35
- That's just it (NCFC) - pants, Apr 16, 17:55:50
- reading your 'actually' post above i was going to apologise for my over-reaction in turn (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 16, 18:38:19
- My beef with you, is probably the same you have with me (NCFC) - pants, Apr 16, 18:55:50
- i had no beef! (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 16, 19:41:06
- Thing is, we're not going to sort this out (NCFC) - pants, Apr 16, 19:47:54
- you're right, we're not (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 16, 20:32:50
- You're probably right (NCFC) - pants, Apr 16, 21:59:42
- dunt be daft, you can often be right (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 16, 22:45:36
- You're probably right (NCFC) - pants, Apr 16, 21:59:42
- you're right, we're not (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 16, 20:32:50
- Thing is, we're not going to sort this out (NCFC) - pants, Apr 16, 19:47:54
- i had no beef! (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 16, 19:41:06
- well said (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 16, 18:40:33
- My beef with you, is probably the same you have with me (NCFC) - pants, Apr 16, 18:55:50
- reading your 'actually' post above i was going to apologise for my over-reaction in turn (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 16, 18:38:19
- That's just it (NCFC) - pants, Apr 16, 17:55:50
- Like when you used a post about Alan Lee that I made (NCFC) - pants, Apr 16, 17:32:35
- for not understanding you? (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 16, 16:18:39
- another fucking idiot (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Apr 16, 16:08:57
- He SAID 5:45 (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 16, 15:35:14
- I reckon there is a clause in Sky's contract... (NCFC) - Arganth, Apr 16, 14:57:40
- i agree with the first 2 paragraphs of that (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 16, 14:12:06
- Personal opinion here... (NCFC) - Arganth, Apr 16, 13:46:38
- yeah wouldn't be surprised cos of a later tv game (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 16, 13:35:26
- um, pedantry has nothing to do with pants original point being wrong (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 16, 13:36:58
- Whatever the day, whatever the subject (NCFC) - pants, Apr 16, 13:15:26
- bye (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 16, 13:31:52
- you're meant to be an adult (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 16, 13:18:36
- To be fair, this is accurate in this case (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 13:05:26
- That'll be ?500 for the legal advice (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 13:05:46
- do you have paypal? I'll send it by that (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 16, 13:08:43
- That'll be ?500 for the legal advice (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 13:05:46
- Wasn't the game that kicked off at 11.30 moved because of Sky ? (NCFC) - Arganth, Apr 16, 13:33:10
- that's a cop out (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 16, 13:02:55
- and you could have just admitted you made a mistake (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 16, 13:05:45
- mate, have a read of this thread and see who the cock is (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 16, 13:04:10
- I think (NCFC) - pants, Apr 16, 13:01:39
- ...and that Pants is why this forum has gone down ****er. (n/m) (NCFC) - Superstar D J, Apr 16, 12:57:45
- not sure what he was suggesting as just woke up (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 16, 12:47:27
- Only had the Monday night KO a couple of times.... (NCFC) - Superstar D J, Apr 16, 12:46:53
- Carrow Road was 2-1 Wark pen incident (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 16, 12:51:46
- Yes it was - I was there. (NCFC) - Superstar D J, Apr 16, 12:54:01
- it's up there in my top 5 norwich moments (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 16, 13:00:48
- I love evening games (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 13:02:59
- me too, morning games are usually awful (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 16, 13:05:07
- I love evening games (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 13:02:59
- it's up there in my top 5 norwich moments (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 16, 13:00:48
- Yes it was - I was there. (NCFC) - Superstar D J, Apr 16, 12:54:01
- Carrow Road was 2-1 Wark pen incident (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 16, 12:51:46
- Don't remember a 5.45pm KO for the past 5-10 years (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 12:45:35
- Because you want me to have a benny every time I post, which is why you two reply (NCFC) - pants, Apr 16, 12:55:50
- yes it used to be a late night kick off (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 16, 12:44:08
- Ahh, you want an extra side salad of denial too (NCFC) - pants, Apr 16, 12:52:32
- what the fuck? (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 16, 12:38:54
- Just over six hours ago (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 12:28:00
- cheers (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 16, 12:39:17
- You startin' on him? Are ya?? (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 16, 12:34:45
- do you reckon aventura is a (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 12:40:56
- nearly 7 actually (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 16, 12:34:04
- shut it (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 12:40:07
- Excellent choice of troll (NCFC) - pants, Apr 16, 12:34:36
- when was it last at 5:45? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 16, 12:24:51
- Most people dont have a clue about matters relating to NCFC as they dont go to games" (NCFC) - megson, Apr 16, 12:51:16
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.