I wouldn't want to count on that

They have a fair bit of leeway within the rules. They had reasons to WANT to hammer Luton and Leeds (Luton for loads of bad publicity over the years and especially recently with the Newell business, and Leeds because Bates was blatantly trying to 'play' the rules and noisily - being Ken Bates - rub it in their faces).
Not sure they have such a reason to WANT to hammer Saints, who over the years have (like us) a reputation as a family club etc. etc.

Posted By: mr carra on April 1st 2009 at 08:03:40

Message Thread

Saints going into admin Radio 5 just said (NCFC) - Bryan Salad Surgery, Apr 1, 04:38:18
- On one of the Saints message boards (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Apr 1, 05:40:58
  - it appears that they have neatly avoided a points pelanty (NCFC) - Tombs, Apr 1, 05:42:53
    - Which may explain the post on the Saints message board that mentions a 17 point deduction (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Apr 1, 07:05:33
      - The way I understand the new admin rule. (NCFC) - cookpassbabtridge, Apr 1, 07:19:27
        
        er, no, I'd rather they lost as many as possible (NCFC) - mr carra, Apr 1, 07:39:26
        
        Yebbut, if we go down with them we want them to have the points deducted next saison (NCFC) - Tombs, Apr 1, 07:55:34
        
        but in his posited scenario.. (NCFC) - mr carra, Apr 1, 08:05:54
        
        I see your point and that would be plan a but (NCFC) - cookpassbabtridge, Apr 1, 07:51:55
        
        I wouldn't want to count on that (NCFC) - mr carra, Apr 1, 08:03:40
    - The parent company is the same co. that grew those spaghetti trees on Panorama in the 70s. (n/m) (NCFC) - The Editor of Milk, Apr 1, 06:37:15
- Parent company (NCFC) - Bryan Salad Surgery, Apr 1, 04:42:26

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.