Thing is

I've barely mentioned any defence for Roeder, I've been talking about the boards 13 years here

I can't help it if in the replies, if users are going to translate what I'm saying as "we shouldn't have sacked roeder"

I can't stop people from jumping to conclusions

Posted By: pants on March 24th 2009 at 14:42:05

Message Thread

FAO PANTS: Three questions (NCFC) - Cart Gap Disco, Mar 24, 14:07:27
- 1 yeah 2 yeah 3 yeah (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Mar 24, 14:08:53
  - But surely then your whole argument falls apart... (NCFC) - Cart Gap Disco, Mar 24, 14:17:03
    - yes no yes no yes (NCFC) - pants, Mar 24, 14:25:23
      - Not really no. (n/m) (NCFC) - Cart Gap Disco, Mar 24, 14:33:41
      - This is where this argument fell apart before it started (NCFC) - pants, Mar 24, 14:32:33
        
        he's grilling your argument (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 24, 14:40:38
        
        No grilling intended! You started the thread! (NCFC) - Cart Gap Disco, Mar 24, 14:39:44
        
        Thing is (NCFC) - pants, Mar 24, 14:42:05
        
        But you are referring to management decisions made by the board, (NCFC) - Maillot Jaune, Mar 24, 14:51:16
    - A very valid point in all this... (NCFC) - Alan, Mar 24, 14:23:09
      - I think we politely did (NCFC) - pants, Mar 24, 14:26:10

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.