No I'm talking about spunking ?3.5m on a player
that wasn't going to stay here long term, who didn't improve the team, and left the minute his release clause was triggered, just like Etuhu's was
Both of those are board errors in inserting those release clauses. You could argue they wouldn't have signed for us if they weren't there, but then we should have looked for someone who did want to play for us
Grant lost those two players of whom he wanted to stay, and given the fact that the last manager couldn't sign a decent right back, and Grant had been playing Hughes there, he need to get an adequate one in, replace two decent centre midfielders (safri and etuhu) and replace a decent striker
He didn't do so with what was available and was sacked
The next guy brought in didn't get much at all cos there were no sales this time, yet on here the last few weeks, you'd have thought he got the world in the slagging off of agent fees
Posted By: pants on March 6th 2009 at 13:47:47
Message Thread
- Yet more SPIN from the board last night, they make me sick (NCFC) - The Big Bad Ulf, Mar 6, 13:05:23
- Burnley Credit Crunch (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Mar 6, 13:21:52
- y'do know it's not a serious post duntcha? (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Mar 6, 13:26:50
- How do we know? (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Mar 6, 13:29:03
- Er, no. Is it? Have I been whooshed? (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Mar 6, 13:28:34
- yes and yes (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Mar 6, 13:33:20
- We couldn't afford to bring in Paterson, but they could though, and Eagles (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 13:24:05
- Also, haven't they got to find ?3M or something to spend on their ground? (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Mar 6, 13:23:15
- PNE Credit Crunch (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Mar 6, 13:23:11
- Yet they still challenge for the play offs season on season (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 13:24:58
- Not arguing with any of that (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Mar 6, 13:26:36
- Yeah, It's the fact they do so with 13,000 most seasons (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 13:29:34
- What is their pricing structure then pants? This is the thing with banging on about our ST (NCFC) - megson, Mar 6, 14:17:13
- Think it's about ?22 a game there (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 14:31:59
- agreed, that's pretty good what they have there. Nice fair comparison then (NCFC) - megson, Mar 6, 14:48:55
- Their season ticket says (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 14:34:33
- Think it's about ?22 a game there (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 14:31:59
- What is their pricing structure then pants? This is the thing with banging on about our ST (NCFC) - megson, Mar 6, 14:17:13
- Yeah, It's the fact they do so with 13,000 most seasons (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 13:29:34
- Not arguing with any of that (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Mar 6, 13:26:36
- Yet they still challenge for the play offs season on season (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 13:24:58
- y'do know it's not a serious post duntcha? (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Mar 6, 13:26:50
- Oh (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Mar 6, 13:19:18
- arrers (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Mar 6, 13:16:37
- Haha, DOOMcaster. ROFL LOL! (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Mar 6, 13:14:13
- Doomcaster! - That's brilliant. Haha. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Mar 6, 13:12:50
- DOOM LOVE SPIN! (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Mar 6, 13:15:58
- Lok. Just noticed Doncaster's salary has increased again. (n/m) (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Mar 6, 13:10:00
- Laughing out kloud, I am. (n/m) (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Mar 6, 13:10:36
- Melodramatic load of old bollocks. (NCFC) - Arganth, Mar 6, 13:08:59
- Some good points in there though (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 13:10:07
- You jest, shirely? (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Mar 6, 13:11:57
- Well Grant and Roeder is passing the buck (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 13:14:05
- I don't see it. Surely saying they were mistakes is accepting the blame? (n/m) (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Mar 6, 13:18:04
- and yet stuck with Worthy for too long (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Mar 6, 13:17:59
- Andy Hughes, Bobinson, Jarrett, Loius Jean............ (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 13:20:39
- Thorne... (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Mar 6, 13:25:09
- They've been here a long time (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 13:33:21
- you forgot about the money dished out on ground improvements and Colney improvements (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Mar 6, 13:43:04
- No I'm talking about spunking ?3.5m on a player (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 13:47:47
- Grant resigned because he admitted he didn't have a clue (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Mar 6, 14:02:46
- zzzzzzzzzz (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 14:05:15
- sometimes the truth is boring I agree (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 6, 14:08:10
- Considering the little game you've just played (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 14:09:39
- naughty step for Charles (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 6, 14:13:48
- Considering the little game you've just played (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 14:09:39
- tremendous... (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Mar 6, 14:07:04
- sometimes the truth is boring I agree (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 6, 14:08:10
- zzzzzzzzzz (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 14:05:15
- Grant resigned because he admitted he didn't have a clue (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Mar 6, 14:02:46
- No I'm talking about spunking ?3.5m on a player (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 13:47:47
- As much as Ulf is getting laughed at because he's angry (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 13:35:22
- you really haven't been paying attention to what on here have been posting have you? (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Mar 6, 13:44:18
- zzzzzzzzzzzz (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 13:48:55
- seriously pants, if you're that bored by it day in day out, how about (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Mar 6, 13:53:25
- You kicked it off (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 13:54:35
- of course, it's never you is it... (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Mar 6, 13:56:39
- Tremendous (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 13:58:26
- of course, it's never you is it... (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Mar 6, 13:56:39
- You kicked it off (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 13:54:35
- seriously pants, if you're that bored by it day in day out, how about (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Mar 6, 13:53:25
- - to what *most* on here - (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Mar 6, 13:44:53
- and I'm not always talking about managers after Roeder and Grant (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 13:51:37
- "They've got a lot to answer for" (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Mar 6, 13:55:13
- and I'm not always talking about managers after Roeder and Grant (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 13:51:37
- zzzzzzzzzzzz (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 13:48:55
- you really haven't been paying attention to what on here have been posting have you? (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Mar 6, 13:44:18
- you forgot about the money dished out on ground improvements and Colney improvements (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Mar 6, 13:43:04
- They've been here a long time (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 13:33:21
- Thorne... (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Mar 6, 13:25:09
- Andy Hughes, Bobinson, Jarrett, Loius Jean............ (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 13:20:39
- Well Grant and Roeder is passing the buck (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 13:14:05
- You jest, shirely? (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Mar 6, 13:11:57
- Some good points in there though (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 13:10:07
- *Wipes the spittle from his screen* (n/m) (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Mar 6, 13:08:01
- "There are worse boards" Was that really said? (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 13:07:55
- Burnley Credit Crunch (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Mar 6, 13:21:52
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.