Wages were not reduced on relegation

We told our good players that if they stayed their wages would be cut. So they left. Then Worthy signed a load of new players who weren't as good, and paid them more or less the same. So our wage costs hardly reduced at all.

It was the grossest of all the gross acts of gross stupidity since relegation

Posted By: Old Git on February 26th 2009 at 14:38:34

Message Thread

I presume Doncaster's comments about the playing budget have been mentioned below (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 26, 14:33:06
- Small is right, as much as we hate to admit it. (NCFC) - megson, Feb 26, 15:11:52
  - That Brizzle chairman has no substantial money til his company floats and (NCFC) - Jim, Feb 26, 16:33:23
  - We're going to bloody lose Croft as well aren't we? (NCFC) - Small, Feb 26, 15:22:05
    - Yup, we are. FFS there are players still playing the game worth considerably more (NCFC) - megson, Feb 26, 15:26:50
      - if only the dot.com bubble had lasted... (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 26, 15:43:15
- He was interviewed on Radio Norfolk on Saturday (NCFC) - Small, Feb 26, 14:47:09
- Wages were not reduced on relegation (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 26, 14:38:34
  - Yes. They proudly announced that wages would be cut by 50%-75% (NCFC) - Small, Feb 26, 14:50:33
    - Oh don't (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 26, 14:55:04
- it's only a game... (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 26, 14:37:22
- no one had said a word !!!! (n/m) (NCFC) - south, Feb 26, 14:35:13
  - couldn't see anything, just about the agents' fees (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 26, 14:37:17
    - before the agents' fees (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 26, 14:38:41

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.