Yes, he was quite excited wasn't he? I did think he was right at the time
Not as any slight against the Doc, tough tackle to make.
Can't really see the lines too well from our end, looked very very messy to me, didn't see any significant change in the balls direction.
If he has got a toe on it, that's a cracking challenge!
Won't be overturned though.
They don't really bother for chumps sides do they. I'm sure there is a big club player contesting a Yellow for stabbing an opponent or something so they'll spend all day working out an excuse to let him off.
On that subject, Etherington should appeal and forward the footgage of Ronaldo kicking out earlier in the season. If he can do it then that's the precedent set.
Posted By: megson on February 9th 2009 at 14:31:23
Message Thread
- We are appealing the card (NCFC) - megson, Feb 9, 14:21:57
- I was up applauding what I thought was a brilliant tackle & although the linesmans gave a (NCFC) - lovely old job, Feb 9, 14:26:02
- Yes, he was quite excited wasn't he? I did think he was right at the time (NCFC) - megson, Feb 9, 14:31:23
- No champ appeals successful this season (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 9, 14:40:23
- I don't hold out much hope of a rescind (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 15:00:14
- No, I agree (NCFC) - megson, Feb 9, 15:05:56
- "no no no wait a second, they have a good chef, before we go to the pub, (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 15:09:00
- No, I agree (NCFC) - megson, Feb 9, 15:05:56
- probably get it extended (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 9, 14:48:06
- frivolous appeal :s (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 15:03:21
- I don't hold out much hope of a rescind (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 15:00:14
- No champ appeals successful this season (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 9, 14:40:23
- I am still fucking angry know. (n/m) (NCFC) - lovely old job, Feb 9, 14:26:19
- Quaking in his socks: Lovely Old Job's Lovely Old Cat. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Feb 9, 14:39:03
- Calm down loj... it's not good for your ticker. (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Feb 9, 14:27:53
- ... (NCFC) - camcan, Feb 9, 14:40:44
- I know, I know back to work for me. (n/m) (NCFC) - lovely old job, Feb 9, 14:33:37
- Yes, he was quite excited wasn't he? I did think he was right at the time (NCFC) - megson, Feb 9, 14:31:23
- Good. (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Feb 9, 14:24:35
- Does D'urso get a say? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 14:23:26
- No coz he's a knobber. (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Feb 9, 14:24:51
- nice one, we might stand a chance then. The fa admitted he was a cock last season over the (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 14:25:55
- missed that one (NCFC) - Tombs, Feb 9, 14:28:22
- yeah i hope so, bizarre to let him ref us again really. (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Feb 9, 14:27:48
- nice one, we might stand a chance then. The fa admitted he was a cock last season over the (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 14:25:55
- No coz he's a knobber. (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Feb 9, 14:24:51
- I was up applauding what I thought was a brilliant tackle & although the linesmans gave a (NCFC) - lovely old job, Feb 9, 14:26:02
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.