Thing is though
If they go to FA disciplinary hearings are the evidential rules the same as in a court of law?
There may be no criminal convictions come out of this programme but it has exposed that there is blatant stuff going on and it will all come out now - every tabloid will be sniffing round any scandals now. I personally think Big sam is screwed - makes you wonder if the FA were tipped off when deciding about the England job!
Posted By: Jim on September 20th 2006 at 09:29:19
Message Thread
- The Panorama debate below (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 20, 09:18:28
- The Judge kept saying below that there was no evidence. (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Sep 20, 09:26:29
- That's his job (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 20, 09:37:16
- Oh, and I think Phil Gartside got a rough deal. (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Sep 20, 09:33:14
- Think the Redknapp thing was shown... (NCFC) - Brom, Sep 20, 09:29:41
- Thing is though (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 20, 09:29:19
- The FA disciplinary system is a mess. (n/m) (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Sep 20, 09:33:56
- Oops. Meant to say that... (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Sep 20, 09:35:40
- The FA disciplinary system is a mess. (n/m) (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Sep 20, 09:33:56
- who then (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 20, 09:22:53
- The Judge kept saying below that there was no evidence. (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Sep 20, 09:26:29
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.