Of course. So it was nothing to do with

you taking umbrage at pants continually mentioning Jim's unfilfillment commitment to pay money into a charity from the bet pants and he had, and when you suggested pants was stealing money from a charity below (WHAT THE FUCK??), and he didnt respond, you thought, "let's take this one a little further, see if I can get him to respond".

That thought never crossed your mind. Of course it wouldnt have, as you dont troll pants do you, you just 'disagree with him a few times', you think he brings it on himself, dont you?

Posted By: Yellalee, Jan 18, 20:36:12