THE ALTERNATIVES

The site actually makes the point AGAINST sacking GR.

If you look at the list of "alternatives"

Its a mixture of totally unproven mangers (Peter Grant anyone?)

A list of managers who would never come here.
(didnt they read the recent Curbs interview)

And a list of managers who have as much failure/baggage as Roeder.

Basically if you can`t come up with a realistic alternative then it makes your argument very weak.

I am not expecting an "out site" to be balanced but what about the good things he has done.
You have to be balanced to form an opinion.

Posted By: usacanary, Jan 6, 23:36:59